Friday, 6 January 2017
Zionists insisted the British lie about the true intention of the Balfour Declaration until “it
was too late to do anything about it.” This has always been their MO.
The true agenda is to ethnically cleanse Palestine and expand Israel’s borders.
This is behind the turmoil in Libya, Iraq and Syria, and the threat to Iran.
Consider that Donald Trump now is in the pocket of this “fascist racist cult” (Suarez’ words.)
Most people don’t know that Zionism, like Communism, are Freemasonic (i.e. Cabalist Jewish) organizations. The article illustrates the principle that satanic cults exploit their members. Zionists used Jews as cannon fodder.
Below is an excerpt from a speech Dec. 14 by Tom Suarez,
author of State of Terror to the British House of Lords on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration.
“Jews who opposed and tried to warn of the emerging fascism were
assassinated, and indeed most victims of Zionist assassinations–that
is, targeted, rather than indiscriminate–were Jews.”
By Tom Suarez
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)
In their behind-the-scenes meetings, [Chaim] Weizmann and [Anthony de] Rothschild treated
the ethnic cleansing of non-Jewish Palestinians as indispensable to
their plans, and they repeatedly complained to the British that the
settlers were not being treated preferentially enough over the
Palestinians. And they insisted that the British must lie about the
scheme until it is too late for anyone to do anything about it.
In correspondence with Balfour, Weizmann justified his lies by
slandering the Palestinians and Jews–that is, the Middle East’s
indigenous Jews, who were overwhelmingly opposed to Zionism and whom
Weizmann smeared with classic anti-Semitic stereotypes. The Palestinians
he dismissed as, in so many words, a lower type of human, and this was
among the reasons he and other Zionist leaders used for refusing
democracy in Palestine–if the “Arabs” had the vote, he said, it would
lower the Jew down to the level of a “native”.
With the establishment of the British Mandate, four decades of peaceful
Palestinian resistance had proved futile, and armed Palestinian
resistance–which included terrorism–began. Zionist terror became the
domain of formal organizations that attacked anyone in the way of its
messianic goals–Palestinian, Jew, or British. These terror organizations
operated from within the Zionist settlements and were actively
empowered and shielded by the settlements and the Jewish Agency, the
recognized semi-autonomous government of the Zionist settlements, what
would become the Israeli government.
There was no substantive difference between the acknowledged
terror organizations–most famously, the Irgun, and Lehi, the so-called
Stern Gang–and the Jewish Agency, and its terror gang, the Hagana. The
Agency cooperated, collaborated, and even helped finance the Irgun.
The relationship between the Jewish Agency, and the Irgun and
Lehi, was symbiotic. The Irgun in particular would act on behalf of the
Hagana so that the Jewish Agency could feign innocence. The Agency would
then tell the British that they condemn the terror, while steadfastly
refusing any cooperation against it, indeed doing what they could to
shield it.
ZIONISTS USED CHILDREN TO PLANT BOMBS
The fascist nature of the Zionist enterprise was apparent both to US and
British intelligence. The Jewish Agency tolerated no dissent and sought
to dictate the fates of all Jews. Children were radicalised as part of
the methodology of all three major organizations, and by extension, the
Jewish Agency.
Britain’s wake-up call regarding the Zionists’ indoctrination of
children came on the 8th of July, 1938. That day, the Irgun blew up a
bus filled with Palestinian villagers. Now, this was not the first time
the Irgun had done something of this sort, but this time the British
caught the bomber. She was a twelve year old schoolgirl.
Teenagers, both boys and girls, were commonly used to plant
bombs in Palestinian markets and conduct other terror attacks. Teachers
were threatened or removed if they tried to intervene in the
indoctrination of their students, and the students themselves were
blocked from advancement if they resisted, even being taught to betray
their own parents if those parents tried to instill some moderation.
Jews who opposed and tried to warn of the emerging fascism were
assassinated, and indeed most victims of Zionist assassinations–that is,
targeted, rather than indiscriminate–were Jews.
From the beginning of World War II through to the summer of 1947, there
were virtually no Palestinian attacks, even though Zionist terror
against Palestinians continued. A British explanation for the
Palestinians’ failure to respond in kind was that they understood that
the attacks were a trap, intended to elicit a response that the Zionists
would frame as an attack against which they would have to ‘defend’
themselves. This was a Zionist tactic noted by the British as early as
1918, and it remains Israel’s default strategy today, most blatantly in
Gaza, but also in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
As late as the fall of 1947, the Jewish Agency was concerned by the
Palestinians’ failure to respond to its provocation, but when the end of
1947 came and the Jewish Agency could wait no longer for the civil war
it needed, it was simply a matter of ratcheting up the terror….
ZIONISTS USED JEWS AS CANNON FODDER
Much has been written on the collaboration between the Zionists and fascists during the war, the best known of course being the Haavara Transfer agreement
that broke the anti-Nazi boycott. One of the least known was Lehi’s
attempted collaboration with the Italian fascists. In its nearly
concluded ‘Jerusalem Agreement’ of late 1940, Lehi would help the
fascists win the war, and in return the fascists would uproot any Jewish
communities not in Palestine and force their populations to Palestine.
If this sounds like a scheme so extreme that only fanatical Lehi could
have conjured it, it is essentially what the Israeli state ultimately
succeeded at in the early 1950s–most catastrophically, when it
conducted a false-flag terror campaign against Jews in Iraq to destroy that ancient community and move its population to Israel as ethnic fodder.
Violence
targeting Jews was, and I would argue remains, a core tactic of
Zionism. In fact, the single most deadly terror attack of the entire
Mandate period was not the bombing of the King David Hotel, left, in
1946 as is commonly thought. Even some of the Irgun’s bombings of
Palestinian markets killed more people than the King David attack. But
the most deadly single terror attack was the Jewish Agency’s bombing of
the immigrant ship Patria in 1940, killing an estimated 267 people, of
whom more than 200 were Jews fleeing the Nazis.
The Jewish Agency bombed the Patria because
it was bringing the DPs to Mauritius, where the British had facilities
for them. The Agency needed the DPs to be settlers in Palestine without
delay, and was willing to risk the lives of all aboard in order to get
the survivors to remain–which, indeed, they did.
In further violence against its Jewish victims, the Agency framed the
dead for the bombing. It spread the lie that the DPs themselves blew up
the vessel, that they committed mass suicide rather than not go directly
to Palestine, posthumously conscripting the dead to serve the Zionist
myth.
This was no aberration, but the driving principle of the Zionist
project: Persecuted Jews served the political project, not the other way
around.
SEALING THE ESCAPE DOORS
Another major tactic of violence against Jews by the Jewish Agency and
American Zionist leadership was the sabotaging of safe haven in order to
force them to Palestine. As but one example, in 1944 US Zionist leaders
sabotaged President Roosevelt’s provisional success in establishing a
half million new homes for European DPs, most of these homes in the
United States and Britain. When Roosevelt’s aide Morris Ernst visited
the Zionist leaders in an attempt to save the program, he was, in his
words, “thrown out of parlours and accused of treason”– ‘treason’,
because he was Jewish, and the Zionists owned Jews.
Nor were those already settled safe. In 1946, the Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi
of Palestine, Yitzhak Herzog, conducted a massive kidnapping operation
of Jewish orphans that had been adopted by European families when their
parents perished years earlier. Removing ten thousand children from
their homes was the number he cited to the NY Times as his goal. In the
National Archives, I found a copy of his own record of the trip.
Herzog railed against the fierce resistance he met in every country by
horrified local Jewish leaders who tried to protect the children. But
Herzog used his political clout to circumvent them. In France, for
example, facing the steadfast refusal of the Jewish leaders to betray
the children, Herzog met the Prime Minister of France from whom [he]
demanded promulgation of a law which would oblige every family to
declare the particulars of the children it houses, so that those of
Jewish background could be exposed and put back in orphanages until they
can be shipped to Palestine–quite a Kafkaesque twist on Passover for
these children who had just been spared the Nazis.
Herzog’s justification for the kidnappings was that for a Jew to
be raised in a non-Jewish home is “much worse than physical murder”.
Yet even this ghastly justification fails to explain what was actually
taking place, because at the same time Herzog was ‘rescuing’ Jewish
orphans from this fate “much worse than physical murder”, his Jewish
Agency colleagues were sabotaging Jewish adoptive homes in England for
young survivors still in the camps. The real reason for all of it, of
course, was that the children were needed to serve the settler project
as demographic fodder.
To that end, the Jewish Agency had coerced President Truman to segregate
Jewish DPs into Zionist indoctrination camps, despite objections that
it echoed Nazi behaviour. For these people who had just survived the
unthinkable, then severed from the rest of humanity into these
brainwashing camps, there was no such thing as free thought.
The camps nurtured such fanaticism that it shocked a joint US-UK
committee that visited in 1946. Before these camps, few DPs wanted to go
to Palestine. But now the Committee found them in a delirious state,
threatening mass suicide if they did not go to Palestine. Suggestions of
new homes in the United States, which had always been the favored
destination, were again met with threats of mass suicide.
WAR AGAINST ALLIES
DPs were also groomed to bring Zionist terrorism to Europe, bombing
Allied trains and Allied facilities. The bombing of the British embassy
in Rome in 1946, for example, was by DPs brainwashed in these camps, as
was a near-catastrophe in the Austrian Alps in 1947 when DPs nearly blew
a train off a steep trestle into a deep abyss, which would almost
certainly have sent its two hundred civilians and Allied troops to their
deaths.
German
Jewish immigrants to Palestine during war were outraged by the
Zionists’ exploitation of the Nazi horrors they had just fled. This
outrage given voice by, among others, the prominent journalist Robert
Weltsch, editor of Berlin newspaper until banned by the Nazis in 1938.
Weltsch warned that Zionist leaders have not yet understood that the
enemy seeks the destruction of the Jews … We who have been here only a
few years, we know what Nazism is.
Zionists, rather, are “taking part in the crash of European Jewry only
as spectators”, fighting the British and keeping Jews from joining the
Allied struggle while getting comfortable and rich from their political
project in Palestine. Recent immigrants from Germany and Central Europe,
he said, have no representation among the Zionist ruling establishment.
If they did, we would have demanded that the Yishuv should put itself
at the disposal of Britain for the fight against Hitler and Nazism.
But–and I am still quoting Weltsch– “They do not want to fight against
Hitler because his fascist methods are also theirs … They do not want
our young men to join the [Allied] Forces … day after day they are
sabotaging the English War Effort.”
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment