Islam is the real positive change that you need to change for being a better person or a perfect human being, you can change yourself if you read QURAN, IF YOU DO THAT !! you will change this UMMAH, say I am not A Sunni or Shia, BUT I am just a MUSLIM. Be a walking QURAN among human-being AND GUIDE THEM TO THE RIGHT PATH.
Friday, June 28, 2013
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Monday, June 24, 2013
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Bullets to babies, Somalia’s war surgeons learn skills of peace
AL Arabiya
After more than two decades of bloody civil war, Somalia remains a very dangerous place, but security has slowly improved, with Islamist fighters linked to al-Qaeda on the back foot despite launching a deadly bombing campaign.
For the surgeons of Medina hospital, whose specialized war wound operating theatres were set up shortly after the collapse of the government in 1991, that gradual reduction has meant they can start to focus on more everyday health problems for the first time, and not just bomb blasts or bullet wounds.
“Medina... is the thermometer of the temperature of the security in the city,” said hospital director Mohamed Yusuf Hassan.
Surgeons now are tackling elective surgeries - scheduled operations, not emergencies - and the decrease in war wounds the Mogadishu hospital treats shows how the “situation has improved,” he added.
While the war wounded last year made up almost all of the hospital’s cases - 95 percent, Hassan estimates - that has now eased to around three-quarters.
“Step by step security is improving,” Hassan said, adding he hoped that in the year ahead elective surgeries could rise to as many as half the hospital’s cases.
In Somalia, however, improvements are relative.
In the emergency ward, a government soldier rests by the bedside of a colleague, shot in the belly last week.
Beds crowd even the corridor, with more than a dozen people all shot or wounded in recent attacks by Shebab Islamist extremists, or clashes between rival groups within the often violent city awash with guns.
But in the obstetrics ward, Shurkri Abdi recovers from a Caesarean section performed to deliver her seventh baby - and her first child born inside a hospital.
“I was living in the bush and I didn’t expect to come to the hospital,” Abdi said, her still unnamed child sleeping in a cot beside her. “But I fell down and my baby was in danger so they took me here.”
For Nimo Abdi Hassan, the doctor who delivered the child, such cases signal a shift in Somalia’s fortunes.
“War-wounded patients only used to be received here," she said. But since the number of cases involving gunshot wounds or shell injuries has fallen, staff are treating a greater variety of cases,” she explained.
“If peace continues, we could transfer from an emergency hospital to a general hospital for all cases,” she said.
Always
busy, overstretched surgeons rarely had time for cases that emergency
rooms in less-violent cities would tackle, meaning many doctors simply
had to drop procedures that are routine in other parts of the world.
Now, as the cases of war wounds diminish, doctors in Somalia are for the first time able to start tackling common conditions like appendicitis, ovarian cysts or hernias.
“We need training... but in terms of the actual surgical skills, well we have that," Hassan said, adding his doctors are hugely experienced, even if they are not necessarily up to date with the latest techniques or know little but basic operating wards.
“They have surgeon’s hands... completing surgery after surgery with so much experience,” he added.
The World Health Organization is supporting efforts to train doctors like them in Somalia in the skills needed to treat these everyday health problems often ignored during the years of conflict.
But there is still a long way to go. Even as the hospital director speaks, the sharp rattle of multiple rounds of rifle fire echoes close by.
Shortly after, a man with gunshot wounds is rushed into the hospital for the surgeons to try to patch up.
“Before, when there was fighting close by, stray bullets would even injure people inside the hospital, bullets coming through the roof,” Hassan said, on a rare break from his work, resting in the shade of a tree in the grounds of the sprawling hospital compound.
“It’s better now, but still, I don’t know how long it will take to become a normal city.”
Still, those improvements in security have also meant people can reach the hospital more easily, meaning the doctors in Mogadishu are busier than ever.
In 2011, heavily fortified trenches and sandbag walls cut the city in two, marking the slow street-by-street progress of the African Union (AU) and Somali government troops creeping forward to wrest territory from the Shebab.
Today, those frontlines are gone, after the overnight pullout of fixed positions by the Shebab in August 2011.
Student doctors once filled the medical school at Mogadishu University, but the compound is now overgrown with thick bushes, the buildings in ruins or inhabited by displaced people, and the main grounds occupied by sandbagged positions of Burundian troops from the AU force.
“So much was destroyed in this city during the years of fighting, it will take a long time to return to what Somalia once was,” said Abdi Shuib, a former history lecturer at the university, now working as a translator for the Burundians.
In the school’s place, AU military doctors provide a clinic for locals in need of healthcare.
“Things have changed in Somalia, but I still dream of the university opening again, and training returning,” Shuib said, on a break between translating for Somalis receiving medical support in a basic army tent.
A woman holds her six-year-old malnourished son as they sit in a hospital in Somalia. (AFP)
AFP, Mogadishu-Somalia
Not yet named but much loved by watchful parents, a newly born baby
boy is a small symbol of change: a birth, not a death for Somalia’s key
war hospital.After more than two decades of bloody civil war, Somalia remains a very dangerous place, but security has slowly improved, with Islamist fighters linked to al-Qaeda on the back foot despite launching a deadly bombing campaign.
For the surgeons of Medina hospital, whose specialized war wound operating theatres were set up shortly after the collapse of the government in 1991, that gradual reduction has meant they can start to focus on more everyday health problems for the first time, and not just bomb blasts or bullet wounds.
“Medina... is the thermometer of the temperature of the security in the city,” said hospital director Mohamed Yusuf Hassan.
Surgeons now are tackling elective surgeries - scheduled operations, not emergencies - and the decrease in war wounds the Mogadishu hospital treats shows how the “situation has improved,” he added.
While the war wounded last year made up almost all of the hospital’s cases - 95 percent, Hassan estimates - that has now eased to around three-quarters.
“Step by step security is improving,” Hassan said, adding he hoped that in the year ahead elective surgeries could rise to as many as half the hospital’s cases.
In Somalia, however, improvements are relative.
In the emergency ward, a government soldier rests by the bedside of a colleague, shot in the belly last week.
Beds crowd even the corridor, with more than a dozen people all shot or wounded in recent attacks by Shebab Islamist extremists, or clashes between rival groups within the often violent city awash with guns.
But in the obstetrics ward, Shurkri Abdi recovers from a Caesarean section performed to deliver her seventh baby - and her first child born inside a hospital.
“I was living in the bush and I didn’t expect to come to the hospital,” Abdi said, her still unnamed child sleeping in a cot beside her. “But I fell down and my baby was in danger so they took me here.”
For Nimo Abdi Hassan, the doctor who delivered the child, such cases signal a shift in Somalia’s fortunes.
“War-wounded patients only used to be received here," she said. But since the number of cases involving gunshot wounds or shell injuries has fallen, staff are treating a greater variety of cases,” she explained.
“If peace continues, we could transfer from an emergency hospital to a general hospital for all cases,” she said.
‘I don't know how long it will take to become a normal city’
Always
busy, overstretched surgeons rarely had time for cases that emergency
rooms in less-violent cities would tackle, meaning many doctors simply
had to drop procedures that are routine in other parts of the world.Now, as the cases of war wounds diminish, doctors in Somalia are for the first time able to start tackling common conditions like appendicitis, ovarian cysts or hernias.
“We need training... but in terms of the actual surgical skills, well we have that," Hassan said, adding his doctors are hugely experienced, even if they are not necessarily up to date with the latest techniques or know little but basic operating wards.
“They have surgeon’s hands... completing surgery after surgery with so much experience,” he added.
The World Health Organization is supporting efforts to train doctors like them in Somalia in the skills needed to treat these everyday health problems often ignored during the years of conflict.
But there is still a long way to go. Even as the hospital director speaks, the sharp rattle of multiple rounds of rifle fire echoes close by.
Shortly after, a man with gunshot wounds is rushed into the hospital for the surgeons to try to patch up.
“Before, when there was fighting close by, stray bullets would even injure people inside the hospital, bullets coming through the roof,” Hassan said, on a rare break from his work, resting in the shade of a tree in the grounds of the sprawling hospital compound.
“It’s better now, but still, I don’t know how long it will take to become a normal city.”
Still, those improvements in security have also meant people can reach the hospital more easily, meaning the doctors in Mogadishu are busier than ever.
In 2011, heavily fortified trenches and sandbag walls cut the city in two, marking the slow street-by-street progress of the African Union (AU) and Somali government troops creeping forward to wrest territory from the Shebab.
Today, those frontlines are gone, after the overnight pullout of fixed positions by the Shebab in August 2011.
Student doctors once filled the medical school at Mogadishu University, but the compound is now overgrown with thick bushes, the buildings in ruins or inhabited by displaced people, and the main grounds occupied by sandbagged positions of Burundian troops from the AU force.
“So much was destroyed in this city during the years of fighting, it will take a long time to return to what Somalia once was,” said Abdi Shuib, a former history lecturer at the university, now working as a translator for the Burundians.
In the school’s place, AU military doctors provide a clinic for locals in need of healthcare.
“Things have changed in Somalia, but I still dream of the university opening again, and training returning,” Shuib said, on a break between translating for Somalis receiving medical support in a basic army tent.
Al Arabiya
Al-Shabaab insurgents attacked and shot their way into a key
U.N. compound in Somalia's capital Mogadishu, June 19, 2013. (File
photo: AFP)
Associated Press, Mogadishu
Al-Qaeda-linked militants detonated several bombs and breached the
main U.N. compound in Somalia’s capital Wednesday, sparking gun battles
that killed at least 12 people. A U.N. official said at least three
foreign and one Somali staff members were believed to be among the dead.The attack comes only six months after the United Nations expanded its presence in Mogadishu, where it had kept only a small operation because Islamic insurgents had controlled much of the capital until being pushed out in an offensive in 2011.
Al-Shabaab said on its Twitter feed shortly after Wednesday’s attack began that its fighters “are now in control of the entire compound and the battle is still ongoing.”
African Union and Somali security forces responded and took control of the compound about an hour later. The U.N. staff who sought refuge in the bunker then were evacuated to the secure military base and airport complex across the street, Parker said.
A U.N. official, who insisted on anonymity because he was not an official spokesman, said he believed three foreigners were killed: one Kenyan and two South Africans.
“There was not very much time to get into the safe area,” said another U.N. official, Ben Parker, a spokesman for the United Nations Assistance Mission in Somalia.
The top U.N. official on Somalia, Nicholas Kay, also works out of the building but was not inside the compound when it was attacked.
At 11:30 a.m. the compound was rocked by the first explosion. At least two others followed, Parker said. Dozens of staff from U.N. humanitarian and development agencies were in the compound and many were moved to the secure bunker, he said.
Mohamed Ali, an ambulance driver, said he transported five dead civilian bodies and 10 people who were wounded.
An Associated Press reporter who went inside the U.N. compound after the battle saw two dead bodies of what appeared to be Al-Shabaab attackers wearing Somali military uniforms. An official said seven attackers died in total.
Somali Prime Minister Abdi Farah Shirdon said he is appalled that “our friends and partners” at the U.N. who are carrying out humanitarian activities would be the victims “of such barbaric violence.” An African Union official, Mahamet Saleh Annadif, condemned the “cowardly” attack and sent condolences “to those who had lost loved ones.”
The U.N. has had only a small presence in Mogadishu in recent years. In December, though, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon touched down in Mogadishu wearing a bullet proof jacket to announce a return of the U.N.’s political office to the seaside capital.
That security measure was necessary because of Al-Shabaab, the al-Qaeda-linked militant group.
One of the three blasts included a car bomb that largely blew down the compound’s front gate. Inside walls were scarred with bullet marks.
The attacked compound just across the street from the secure airport complex, where U.N.-backed African Union military forces are based. The U.N. compound is used by agencies like UNICEF, the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNDP.
Anarchy
Mogadishu fell into anarchy in 1991 and is just beginning to move past years of sustained conflict. The U.N. and foreign embassies were absent from Mogadishu for close to two decades.African Union forces pushed Al-Shabaab out of Mogadishu in August 2011, meaning residents did not have to live through daily battles for the first time in years.
An international presence slowly began to return and the U.N. began the process of moving its personnel from the nearby capital of Nairobi, Kenya, back to Mogadishu, a process that has accelerated in recent weeks.
International embassies - from Turkey and Britain, for example - followed.
Wednesday’s attack underscores the fragile security situation and will force the U.N. and embassies to review their safety plans and decide if they have enough defenses to withstand a sustained Al-Shabaab assault.
Fadumo Hussein, a shopkeeper who was sitting inside her shop near the scene of the attack, described a narrow escape.
“It started with an earsplitting explosion, followed by heavy gunfire,” she said, showing holes made by bullets on her shop. “I crouched and then crawled like an animal. I am very lucky. It was a shocking moment.”
Egyptian girl dies undergoing circumcision
Al Arabiya
Suhair al-Bata’a, 13, died while she was being circumcised in a
village northeast of Cairo. (Photo courtesy of Egypt Independent)
Al Arabiya
Suhair al-Bata’a, a 13-year-old Egyptian girl, has died undergoing
circumcision at a village in the Daqahliya governorate northeast of
Cairo, Egyptian media reported on Sunday.
“We left our daughter with the doctor and the nurse. 15 minutes later, the nurse took my daughter out of the operation room to a nearby room, along with three other girls whom the doctor was circumcising,” Mohammed Ibrahim, a farmer, told Egyptian daily al-Masry al-Youm.
“I waited half an hour, hoping that my daughter would wake up, but, unfortunately, unlike the rest of the girls, she did not,” he said.
The doctor who circumcised Suhair had previously circumcised her elder sister two years ago.
“I want nothing but to hold the doctor accountable and to have justice for my daughter,” Suhair’s mother, Hasanat Naeem Fawzy, told the newspaper.
The police ordered an autopsy and summoned the doctor to find the cause of the young girl’s death.
A health inspector report said the cause of the death was due to “a sharp drop in blood pressure resulting from shock trauma,” the family’s lawyer, Abdel Salam, told al-Masry al-Youm.
Egypt's National Council for Women condemned the deadly incident of female circumcision as a criminal act that reflects “extreme savagery,” calling on the government to investigate the issue and punish the culprits.
UNICEF Egypt has also condemned the incident, saying female circumcision has neither medical nor religious justification.
Abdel Wahab Suleiman, undersecretary of the Ministry of Health in Daqahliya said that the Health Directorate had not yet been notified of the incident and described female genital mutilation as being against the law.
In 1996, Egypt criminalized female genital mutilation; however, many families still illegally circumcise their daughters. In 2009, Egyptian authorities arrested a man for illegally circumcising an eleven-year-old girl, the first time since the ban was introduced.
“We left our daughter with the doctor and the nurse. 15 minutes later, the nurse took my daughter out of the operation room to a nearby room, along with three other girls whom the doctor was circumcising,” Mohammed Ibrahim, a farmer, told Egyptian daily al-Masry al-Youm.
“I waited half an hour, hoping that my daughter would wake up, but, unfortunately, unlike the rest of the girls, she did not,” he said.
The doctor who circumcised Suhair had previously circumcised her elder sister two years ago.
“I want nothing but to hold the doctor accountable and to have justice for my daughter,” Suhair’s mother, Hasanat Naeem Fawzy, told the newspaper.
The police ordered an autopsy and summoned the doctor to find the cause of the young girl’s death.
A health inspector report said the cause of the death was due to “a sharp drop in blood pressure resulting from shock trauma,” the family’s lawyer, Abdel Salam, told al-Masry al-Youm.
Egypt's National Council for Women condemned the deadly incident of female circumcision as a criminal act that reflects “extreme savagery,” calling on the government to investigate the issue and punish the culprits.
UNICEF Egypt has also condemned the incident, saying female circumcision has neither medical nor religious justification.
Abdel Wahab Suleiman, undersecretary of the Ministry of Health in Daqahliya said that the Health Directorate had not yet been notified of the incident and described female genital mutilation as being against the law.
In 1996, Egypt criminalized female genital mutilation; however, many families still illegally circumcise their daughters. In 2009, Egyptian authorities arrested a man for illegally circumcising an eleven-year-old girl, the first time since the ban was introduced.
Saturday, June 22, 2013
Friday, June 21, 2013
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Monday, June 17, 2013
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Friday, June 14, 2013
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Monday, June 10, 2013
With Scholars Like These… – Yasir Qadhi on “Shaykh al-Azhar” Tantawi / Niqaab Incident
100 4instagram1 0
UPDATE #2: Following the release of Shaykh Tantawi's personal reflection of the incident, in which a much more benign version of the story is stated, where the Shaykh asks the girl why she is so strict and eventually tells a teacher to remove her niqab, and in which he expressly denies telling her that she was unattractive, we will accept his rendering at face value. Allāh knows what happened, and there is no need to get involved in judging which of the two versions is correct (the other version, upon which this article was written, was narrated by eyewitness journalists, and links to their videos can be found in the comments).By now, almost everyone has heard of the recent incident involving the Shaykh al-Azhar, the esteemed Dr. Sayyid Muḥammad Tantawi, with the veiled high-school student. The office of the Shaykh al-Azhar is symbolically the most senior office in the entire Sunni world, outranking even that of the Grand Mufti of Egypt, since it purportedly places in the highest office the most scholarly personality of the oldest and more revered Islamic University in the Sunni world, al-Azhar University. In fact, Dr. Tantawi had previously held the position of the Grand Mufti of Egypt for almost a decade, after which the great leader of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, impressed with his services to Islam, promoted him to the office of Shaykh al-Azhar. Hosni Mubarak should be thanked for promoting Dr. Tantawi to his office, and this promotion shows not only the credentials of the learned Doctor, but also the care and concern that this three-decade veteran leader of Egypt has for the cause of Islam.
We leave his affair to Allāh; the information that this article was written on was based on credible sources (even the Shaykh's office released a statement the next day that affirmed something along the lines of the story occurred, and the Shaykh's silence since the incident, especially in light of world reaction to it, seemed outwardly to affirm the veracity of the story). No matter how credible the sources, I will give the Shaykh the benefit of the doubt since he clearly stated his version. I would also hope that the Shaykh corrects some of the damage done because of this incident (regardless of which version is correct).
I ask Allāh's forgiveness if I stepped beyond bounds.
UPDATE: Following the proposed ban that Tantawi wished to place on females wearing niqab in al-Azhar, other Universities and countries are following suit.
See this video which was released on al-Jazeera regarding veiled students at Cairo University:
Also, MPs from Italy are suggesting a law, based on Tantawi's comments, which would ban the niqab from public spheres:
And the progressive Muslim Canadian Congress have also lobbied the Canadian government to ban the niqab, once again based on Tantawi's statements:
.Dr. Sayyid Tantawi hardly needs an introduction, for he has already established a reputable career, and his resume boasts of such fatwas as the one which encourages Muslim women in France to abandon the headscarf so that they may be in conformity with French law. It appears, however, that the venerable Shaykh understands that his role cannot stop at merely removing the headscarf from our sisters. In his concern for the welfare of the Ummah, he has now taken an even bolder step.
In case some are still unfamiliar with the details of the event which occurred two days ago, here are the details which have been reported by a number of reliable eye-witnesses and the media. When the Grand Shaykh was invited to address a group of young female high-school students, he noticed one of them wearing a face-veil (niqab). This seemed to irritate his Excellency rather mightily, and, his conscience so roused, he proceeded to ask the supercilious girl to remove her veil (of course, he is not the first person to do so, having been preceded by the likes of Jack Straw and Tony Blair, amongst other honorable mentions). The girl refused, and said rather innocently that it was her habit to wear it, and she did not show her face to strangers. The Shaykh's sense of right became even more miffed, so he proceeded to pontificate rather starkly, “The niqab is nothing but culture – it has absolutely no relationship whatsoever with the religion of Islam.” Thus buttressed, he then boldly asked her once again to take off the intimidating cloth. Rather surprisingly, the young girl rejected the demands of the senior-most religious authority in Egypt, stood her ground, and once again reiterated that she was uncomfortable with any man seeing her. The esteemed scholar could not take such an insult to his honorable demand so lightly, nor could he allow a sixteen-year old girl to get the better of him! The temerity of such a girl deserved that the Grand Shaykh put her in her place. Gathering all the might and courage that he needed – for 16 year old girls are known for their tempers and bad moods – he charged on, blasting, “I have already told you that the niqab has absolutely nothing to do with the religion, and it is something that is from custom!” To drive the point home, he added, in a crude Egyptian vernacular, “…and I know the religion better than you, and those who gave birth to you (i.e., your parents).” Of course, such langues was completely justified, as how else was the coarse and ill-mannered young lady going to be taught the refined manners of Islam? Petrified and terrified, intimidated and bullied by a man four times her age, embarrassed in front of her peers and teachers and media by the highest-ranking religious authority in the land, the young lady felt she had no choice but to take off the blameworthy fabric. The Shaykh of al-Azhar, satisfied and vindicated, threw in his final blow, to really put the girl in her place, and teach her a well-deserved lesson that she would never forget. Outdoing his crude expression of a few moments ago by a number of exponential notches, he said, “Ama law kunti hilwa shuwaya la-amilti eh?”
Alas! English simply cannot do justice to the coarseness and incivility of the Shaykh's street-manner talk (which, of course, the impudent young girl fully deserved). While the vulgarity and tone of the language might fool some people, in fact what the Shaykh really did was to skillfully and subtly demonstrate that, despite his high office and erudite mastery of the religion, he was completely in tune with the riff-raffs and hooligans of the alleyways of Cairo. A rough translation – albeit without the vulgar connotations of the Arabic (and my apologies to our English readers for the loss of the coarseness) – would be, “So if you were even a little beautiful, what would you have done then?” The implication, of course, was that the egotistical girl was presuming herself to be worthy of participating in a beauty pageant, hence covering her face out of fear of tempting others. Little did she realize that she was not even qualified to use the adjective 'beautiful' in the same sentence as her name! The wise and nurturing religious father-figure of the nation made sure that the self-esteem of this young sixteen year old girl would forever be shattered – so let all teachers pay heed to the lessons that the Shaykh imparts through his astounding pedagogical skills.
It is comforting to know that the ex-Grand Mufti is more knowledgeable than we are (of course, in his humbleness and humility, he only restricted his greater knowledge to 'the girl and those who gave birth to her', but we all understand that it was only his modesty that precluded more epithets, and allowed the self-praise to be so restrained). Thank God for that, for indeed us simpletons are in need of his seemingly unrestrained knowledge (not to mention his perfect mannerisms and gentle nature).
For indeed, a cursory reading of the hadith literature to people of lesser knowledge such as ourselves shows that the face veil (niqab) was quite common amongst the wives and female Companions of the Prophet salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam.
The niqab appears to have been so common, in fact, that before the only Hajj the Prophet salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam ever performed, as he was instructing people regarding the rites of this Sacred Journey, he had to give a general command to all women that they should not wear the niqab during the state of ihram (Bukhāri in his Saheeh). To an untrained mind, this would indicate that the custom of wearing a niqab had at least some prevalence, or else there would have been no need to caution against it (after all, it's not as if there is a specific hadith prohibiting women from wearing mink fur coats during ihram). One wonders whether perhaps these noble ladies from amongst the Companions had managed to import this un-Islamic practice from Persia (for the learned Shaykh did not tell us which culture it was imported from?) even before Persian customs reached Arabia – an amazing feat indeed!
To further confound us simpletons, we read in the Sunan of Abu Dawud and other sources, that Aishah (r) would lower her loose scarf over her face even during the state of ihram (thus effectively veiling it) when male riders passed them by. Apparently, Aisha understood that the prohibition for wearing niqab only applied to using that cloth, and not to the actual covering of the face (similar to the fact that men cannot wear trousers during ihram but must still cover that portion of the body with other materials). Lest some misguided individual, infatuated with the Roman (?) custom of veiling, inform us that this veiling was specific for the wives of the Prophet, perhaps our very knowledgeable Mufti can better educate us as to how to understand the narration in the Muwatta of imām Malik, which states that Fatima b. al-Mundhir used to cover her face in the state of ihram in a similar manner that Aisha did?
And while we are on the subject, perhaps the erudite scholar can also explain how Umm Khallad, another female Companion, was seen wearing a face veil by the Prophet and other Companions? In one tradition (recorded in Sunan Abu Dawud), we learn that after a certain battle, she was seen hurrying to and fro, searching for her son to see if he were still alive. The companions were amazed that even in such a frantic state of mind, she had covered herself with a veil. One of them commented at her veiled state, at which she replied, “Even if I have lost my son, I shall not suffer the loss of my modesty!” A pity that our ex-Grand Mufti and Shaykh al-Azhar were not present there, for if he were, he would have told her that he was more knowledgeable of the rules of modesty that she was!
It is indeed confounding to simpletons who lack the grace and mastery of books that the Shaykh does to find narration upon narration that seems to assume that wearing a face veil was common practice amongst the earliest of generations. In one, we find that Aishah (r) was recognized by Safwan b. Mu`attal in the 'Incident of the Slander' only because he had seen her before the revelation of the verses of hijab (thus clearly showing that Aishah, at the very least, understood from these verses that she must cover her face). In another narration, we find that `Umar b. al-Khattab recognized Safiyya after the revelation of the verses of hijab by her gait, thus again indicating that he could not see her face (both narrations in the Sahih of Bukhāri).
What perturbs the lesser-educated minds of the Ummah is that this pernicious custom of obscuring the face seems to have crept into this nation rather early. Regarding the interpretation of Surah Ahzab, verse 33, which commands women to '…not display your beauty like the women of Jahiliyya did,' al-Tabari's Tafsir tells us that even the Companions differed amongst themselves regarding whether the face was a part of that beauty which should be covered or not. It appears that the Shaykh al-Azhar was able to detect something which even the Companions missed: that the face covering had nothing to do with Islam! The pervasive insidiousness of this imported fabric was not limited to the Companions, however. We find each and every classical work of legal jurisprudence – from al-Nawawi's Majmu to Ibn Qudamah's Mughni to Ibn Abideen's Radd al-Muhtar to Ibn Abd al-Barr's al-Tamhid – have sections dedicated to this issue. Peculiarly, we find all four classical Sunni schools of law discussing the legal status of the niqab, in numerous major work of fiqh, written throughout the centuries of Islam. In fact, we even find schools of law outside of the four, such as Ibn Hazm's al-Muhalla, that discuss this issue. It is indeed great Providence that we have been blessed with the pedantic wisdom of the Shaykh of the Azhar for being able to cut through and expose such a large conspiracy, which spanned the entire geographic regions of the Ummah, and reached back to the earliest of our times. Without his insight, it would be quite easy for someone to believe that the niqab has been a part of the Islamic tradition from its very inception.
One cannot help but sympathize with someone as learned as Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who is not exactly known for conservative views, yet still says,
“Those who believe that niqab is an
innovation or forbidden are ignorant, and by this they lie about the Law
of God. The least that can be said about the issue of niqab is that it is merely permissible.”
That is why we need government appointed Shuyūkh
of al-Azhar, to correct such misunderstandings in the wisest and most
fatherly of fashions, and to make sure that rash, impetuous young girls
are taught the mercy of our religion and the beauty of our mannerisms.All I can say is: with scholars like these….who needs the French?!
Please note:
1- The purpose of this article is not to discuss the legal ruling of the niqab, but rather to prove that it existed in our tradition and is a part of Islamic culture; whether it is mubah, or mustahab, or wajib is beyond the scope of our discussion.
2- On a personal note, while I do not unconditionally encourage sisters living in America to wear the niqab, I most certainly do not discourage them from doing so, and believe it is their legal and Islamic right to do if they choose to do so.
3- Sarcasm is allowed in our religion when the situation calls for it – and this one most certainly did :) .
Somali leaders appeal for unity as fighting resumes in Kismayo
June 09, 2013
At least eight people have been killed as fighting between the Ras Kamboni militia and a rival militia flared up again in Kismayo, witnesses told AFP Saturday (June 8th).
The parties to the clashes support two different people claiming to
be president of the Jubbaland state -- Ras Kamboni leader Ahmed Madobe
and tribal leader Iftin Hassan Basto.
Fighting broke out Friday evening, paused overnight, but resumed Saturday.
"Fighting started when soldiers from Ras Kamboni attacked and tried to arrest me," Basto told reporters. "But my men fought back and defended me."
Eyewitnesses said eight people were killed in the clashes, while several wounded people were seen being taken to hospital.
"I saw eight dead, three of them civilians, but the toll could be higher as many were wounded," said Mohamed Farey, a resident of Kismayo.
Ras Kamboni spokesman Abdinasir Serar insisted his troops were in full control of Kismayo. "We will end the fighting soon, after we arrest those who were preparing for attacks," he said.
Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud said Sunday he was "very sad" to hear of renewed conflict in Kismayo.
"It is so wrong to see Somalis fighting each other in this way, and violence cannot be used as a means to achieve political ambitions," he said at a press conference in Mogadishu. "The time for fighting is over. We must unite and seek to resolve our differences peacefully. We must unite for the fight against al-Shabaab."
Mohamud said the government would soon hold a reconciliation conference in Kismayo as laid out in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Heads of State Communique on May 24th.
Somali Prime Minister Abdi Farah Shirdon has called on the parties to seek reconciliation through dialogue.
"I suggest for Kismayo sides to stop fighting and solve their difference through dialogue," he said in a statement. "Kismayo and its population cannot avoid fresh tension; I urge the fighting sides to look for another solution rather than fighting."
Fighting broke out Friday evening, paused overnight, but resumed Saturday.
"Fighting started when soldiers from Ras Kamboni attacked and tried to arrest me," Basto told reporters. "But my men fought back and defended me."
Eyewitnesses said eight people were killed in the clashes, while several wounded people were seen being taken to hospital.
"I saw eight dead, three of them civilians, but the toll could be higher as many were wounded," said Mohamed Farey, a resident of Kismayo.
Ras Kamboni spokesman Abdinasir Serar insisted his troops were in full control of Kismayo. "We will end the fighting soon, after we arrest those who were preparing for attacks," he said.
Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud said Sunday he was "very sad" to hear of renewed conflict in Kismayo.
"It is so wrong to see Somalis fighting each other in this way, and violence cannot be used as a means to achieve political ambitions," he said at a press conference in Mogadishu. "The time for fighting is over. We must unite and seek to resolve our differences peacefully. We must unite for the fight against al-Shabaab."
Mohamud said the government would soon hold a reconciliation conference in Kismayo as laid out in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Heads of State Communique on May 24th.
Somali Prime Minister Abdi Farah Shirdon has called on the parties to seek reconciliation through dialogue.
"I suggest for Kismayo sides to stop fighting and solve their difference through dialogue," he said in a statement. "Kismayo and its population cannot avoid fresh tension; I urge the fighting sides to look for another solution rather than fighting."
جرائم الشباب الأخيرة انتهاك للشريعة الإسلامية
عدنان حسين من مقديشو
4 حزيران/يونيو 2013
نفّذ مقاتلو حركة الشباب خلال الأسابيع الماضية سلسلة من الجرائم
والهجمات العنيفة استهدفت المدنيين، مقدمين على اختطاف صوماليين وسرقتهم
وقطع رؤوسهم من دون الاكتراث للشريعة التي تزعم الحركة التقيّد بها.
وفي 30 أيار/مايو، أمرت حركة الشباب بالإفراج عن ستة مقاتلين تابعين لها
كانوا متهمين بنهب ستة آلاف دولار من صيدلية في بارطيري، وكان قد حُكم
عليهم بقطع أياديهم اليمنى.
وقالت يسرى نور عبدالرحمن، 28 عاماً وهي من سكان بلدة بارطيرى، "اجتمعت
مع حشود من سكان البلدة لنشاهد العقاب الذي ينال لحق المتهمين الستة من
مسلحي الشباب. وبينما كنا نتوقع قطع أياديهم اليمنى، وبصورة مفاجئة، أعلن
ممثل الحركة [المسؤول عن إصدار الأحكام] الشيخ آدم نوح عبر سماعات خارجية
ومكبرات الصوت أن ستة من المجاهدين سيضربون اليوم 39 جلدة كعقاب على الجرم
الذي ارتكبوه".
وأشارت إلى أن نوح أمر بإعادة مبلغ 4900 دولار أمريكي إلى الصيدلي الذي هو من مؤيدي حركة الشباب.
وأضافت، "أدهشني هذا القرار المخجل والمضحك الذي أعتبره فعلاً حكماً
خداعاً وتضليلاً لتشجيع عناصرها على التفريط والاعتداء على الثروات الفردية
والعائلية".
وأعلنت عبدالرحمن أن هذا يشكل أحدث مثال على الطابع التعسفي والمخادع
للعقوبات التي تطال عناصر الشباب، بحيث لا ينال المقاتلون الذين يثبت
ضلوعهم في الجرائم التي يُتهمون بها العقوبة المطلوبة لهم. وأضافت أن هذه
العناصر بدأت تنفذ أعمالاً انتقامية كالنهب والاختطاف وقطع الرقاب بحق
المدنيين الصوماليين، ولا سيما أقارب مسؤولين من محافظتي جيدو وهيران.
وطالبت عبدالرحمن القوات التابعة للحكومة الصومالية بوضع حد لممارسات الشباب الشنيعة من اختطاف واغتيال وتعذيب وضرب.
تجاهل الشريعة الإسلامية
وفي هذا السياق، قال العقيد إسحاق علي عبدالله، قائد شرطة محافظة هيران،
إن المتشددين من حركة الشباب يصدرون أحكاماً لا صلة لها بالشريعة
الإسلامية وذلك ليتمكن عناصرها من الإفلات من عقاب السرقة والزنا.
وأوضح أن قضاتها لا يملكون مفهوماً كاملاً لعلم الفقه ومقومات القضاء
النزيه والمحايد، كما أن أحكامهم باطلة لأنها مسيّسة وانتقامية وتستند إلى
قضاء تابع ومتواطئ معها.
واتهم عبدالله حركة الشباب بقطع رأس رجل مسن وابنه في 22 أيار/مايو
الماضي في قرية دودومو قارس التي تقع على بعد 45 كيلومتراً شمال غرب
بلدوين، إضافة إلى سرقة عشرات النوق من القرية.
وقال لصباحي "حان الوقت لمطاردة هؤلاء الخونة من أتباع حركة الشباب
الموالية لتنظيم القاعدة من البلدات والقرى المختلفة من المحافظة لننهي
الظلم والقهر والتمييز والتهميش [بحق المواطنين]".
وأضاف، "وصلنا إلى مرحلة نحتاج فيها أن تحقق آمالنا لأنه سيبزغ قريباً فجر الحرية التي استحقها شعبنا بتضحياته الجسام".
ومن جهته، أكد أحمد عبدالله عثمان إنجي، نائب الرئيس السابق لمحافظة
هيران المكلف بشؤون الأمن، على أن الحركة قطعت رقاب عمه حسين آدم توري
البالغ من العمر 90 عاماً وابنه الشاب بواسطة خنجر حاد وتركتهما ينزفان حتى
الموت.
وأضاف إنجي أن الشباب ستنهار مهما طال الزمن وسيزول تاريخها الشرير
المظلم وسيقتاد زعماؤها الجبنة يوماً ما نحو المعتقلات للمثول امام محكمة
عسكرية.
وأردف قائلاً "لا يمكن أن تستمر عمليات التفخيخ وقطع مئات الرقاب
البريئة ولم يبق للقوات الحكومية وقت إلا أن تنجز مهامها العسكرية لمنع هذا
الأسلوب الفاحش الذي أذاق الويلات المؤلمة للشعب الصومالي الذي تجرع مرارة
البؤس والحرمان والعيش الكريم".
مصير الصوماليين الستة المخطوفين لا يزال مجهولاً
لم ترد بعد أي معلومات عن مكان تواجد المدنيين الستة الذين يُشتبه أن
يكونوا قد خطفوا على يد عناصر الشباب منذ أسبوعين في منطقة جيدو في 23
أيار/مايو.
وقد وقعت عملية الخطف بين بلدتي عيل واق وبوصار البعيدة عنها مسافة 40
كيلومتراً، حسبما ذكر مفوض بلدة عيل واق، سهل معلم علي. وأشار هذا الأخير
إلى أن السلطات عثرت في وقت لاحق على بقايا سيارة ودراجة استعملتها العناصر
المطلوبة في العملية قبل إحراقها.
وأوضح علي أن إدارته لا تزال تبحث عن الخاطفين.
يُذكر أن حركة الشباب لم تعلن بعد عن مسؤوليتها في تنفيذ هذه العملية،
ولكن ذكر علي أن طريقة الهجوم مماثلة للتكتيكات التي تتبعها مؤخراً الحركة،
إذ تعمد إلى عمليات الخطف وقطع العنوق ونهب الممتلكات الخاصة والعامة لنشر
الذعر بين سكان المناطق التي تقع تحت سيطرة الحكومة الصومالية.
وأضاف علي أن حركة الشباب التي تكبدت خسائر عسكرية فادحة تحاول حالياً تقسيم الشعب عبر إثارة الفتن والانتفاضات القبلية ضد الحكومة، مؤكداً أن الشعب الصومالي لن يستسلم للترهيب.
وتابع أن عمليات الخطف محرّمة في الشريعة الإسلامية وفي القانون الدولي
وهناك مبادئ وأعراف تطبق بحكم أسير الحرب، أما خطف واحتجاز المدنيين، فهو
وسيلة ضغط جائرة غير مشروعة وغير مقبولة.
UK's new visa rules 'causing anguish' for families
10 June 2013 Last updated at 12:33 GMT
New
financial rules for migrants from outside the European Union are
tearing UK families apart and causing anguish, a group of MPs and peers
have said.
They said thousands of Britons had been unable to bring a
non-EU spouse to the UK since July 2012, when minimum earnings
requirements were introduced.Children have also been separated from a parent, the parliamentary group said.
The Home Office said the rules were designed to ease the burden of migration on the taxpayer.
Rules that came into force a year ago require any British citizen who wants to sponsor their non-European spouse's visa to be able to show they earn at least £18,600 a year, rising to £22,400 to sponsor a child, and a further £2,400 for each further child.
The inquiry by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Migration, which is calling for an independent review of the minimum income requirement, looked at more than 175 cases from families affected by the rules.
Forty-five claimed their inability to meet the income threshold had led to the separation of children, including British children, from a non-EU parent, the group said.
In one case, a woman from outside Europe had been separated from her British husband and two sons, including a five-month-old baby she had been breastfeeding.
Mr Shillinglaw, a self-employed mortgage broker for two years, told the BBC he was being "judged like an employed person".
"Self-employed income is different from employed income. I have got enough money to pay my mortgage and bills, and that should be enough," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"And should anything happen to me, I have a family that will take care of them. My family are wholeheartedly behind what I am doing."
Mark Reckless, Conservative MP on the home affairs select committee, said the government had promised to bring down net immigration and it had done so by "bearing down" on bogus colleges, caps on work visas and reforms on family immigration.
"If you are bringing someone into the country, then you should be expected to support that person without recourse to public expense," he told Today.
"Over time, it might be possible that the regulations could be adjusted. There will be hard cases and we learn in light of those experiences."
'Children shouldn't suffer' The group also heard from a number of UK sponsors in full-time employment at or above the national minimum wage who reported that they were unable to meet the income requirement.
Wider evidence suggested that 47% of the UK working population last year would have failed to meet the income level to sponsor a non-European Economic Area partner, the group said.
By the government's own estimate, almost 18,000 British people will be prevented from being reunited with their spouse or partner in the UK every year as a result of the new rules, it added.
Baroness Hamwee, chairwoman of the inquiry and Liberal Democrat home affairs lead in the House of Lords, said the parliamentary group had been "struck by the evidence showing just how many British people have been kept apart from partners, children and elderly relatives".
"These rules are causing anguish for families and, counter to their original objectives, may actually be costing the public purse," she said.
Liberal Democrat group member Sarah Teather MP said that "whatever the objective of the policy, children shouldn't suffer as a result".
A Home Office spokesman said the rules had been designed to make sure those coming to the UK to join their spouse or partner would not become a burden on the taxpayer and would be well enough supported to integrate effectively.
"High-value migrants would not be refused because their British spouse or partner was not employed," he said.
"They can meet the income threshold by having cash savings of £62,500 or through their own private income, for example from investments. We have also introduced greater flexibility for those holding investments to liquidate them into cash in order to meet the rules."
Related Stories
Afghan Taliban 'behead two boys in Kandahar'
Asia
The Taliban have beheaded two boys for spying in the southern Afghan province of Kandahar, officials say.
One of the boys, a 10-year-old, is reported to have regularly
accepted food handouts from police in the Zhari district to feed his
family. Kandahar's governor condemned the beheading as inhumane and un-Islamic. The Taliban denied killing him and condemned it as well.
Little is known about the other boy, who was 16 years old.
In 2012 the Taliban were accused of beheading a 12-year-old boy and a seven-year-old girl in south and east Afghanistan - the group denied responsibility in both those cases.
Taliban denial The 10-year-old boy was very poor and was known to take food going spare from the police to take home to his family, says the BBC's Mahfouz Zubaide in Kabul.
His killing is said to have taken place on Sunday but news only emerged on Monday as the provincial government condemned it and asked the public to report suspicious behaviour and people.
Later on Monday Kandahar's provincial government posted an update saying that a 16-year-old had also been beheaded by the Taliban.
Correspondents say that the Taliban are known to attack those they suspect of colluding with police and that the Taliban regularly deny such atrocities.
But Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi insisted to the BBC that the group had not beheaded any children in the area.
Taliban fighters in Afghanistan have been known to behead targets in the past, but have always denied attacking children in this way.
Dare you give your son the cancer sex talk?
The Telegraph
The Michael Douglas story triggered anxieties about the link between oral sex and throat cancer in men - but it's still not easy to tackle the subject with your children
Photo: Alamy
By Caroline Lavender
5:14PM BST 09 Jun 2013
Michael Douglas may have retracted his claim about what caused his throat
cancer – but, as the mother of two red-blooded sons aged 18 and 21, the
story still triggered anxieties about the link between oral sex and this
type of cancer in men.
Neither I nor their father have the least idea how to approach the topic with
them. Even if we summoned the courage to do so, we are unsure what we would
advise.
Our sons are well-informed about the importance of safe sex, thanks to their
savvy teachers rather than their tongue-tied parents. But I doubt whether
even their forward-looking schools would have covered the potential risk of
throat cancer from the human papillomavirus (HPV).
To recap: about 15 types of HPV, which is sexually transmitted, are linked
with the risk of cancer – be it oral, cervical, vaginal, anal or penile.
Disturbingly, of the 6,000 throat cancers diagnosed annually, between 25 and
35 per cent are thought to be HPV-related, and are most commonly found in
heterosexual men in their forties and fifties.
Is more frequent oral sex to blame? The NHS points out that the practice
(cunnilingus, especially) is often a conduit for sexual infections and is
likely to be responsible for HPV transmission to the mouth and throat, with
an apparently greater risk for men giving oral sex to women than vice versa.
So why aren’t boys offered Gardasil, the vaccine that protects against two
strains of HPV linked to 75 per cent of cervical cancers, and which studies
suggest can protect against other HPV-linked cancers, too? Australian
authorities began offering shots to schoolboys earlier this year, and many
experts are calling for a similar move here. But the thinking seems to be
that, once most young women have acquired immunity, their male partners will
do so, too. Cost is another factor.
I’m not sure just how sexually active my sons have been, or are. The elder is now in a serious relationship; the younger one is, I suspect, on the verge of sexual discovery. And I don’t know, nor wish to know, about the types of sex they may engage in.
Private HPV vaccinations for boys are available; although Gardasil is only licensed for boys aged 9-15, it can be prescribed outside this range “at the doctor’s discretion”, according to one clinic. But it isn’t just the cost – about £500 for three injections – that makes me hesitate. How do you approach a young man who has just fallen in love for the first time and suggest that he be vaccinated against an infection he might “catch” from his beloved during certain sexual practices? And since 90 per cent of those who are sexually active have been exposed to HPV by the time they are 25, it may be too late anyway.
Maybe we have been too queasy about raising this issue with our children – or maybe we are too anxious, given that the risk of getting cancer from oral sex is probably very small, compared with the risk from tobacco and alcohol. Clearly we can’t get young adults to swear off oral sex, though we might send them useful NHS advice on preventing infections via this route, or offer to fund a private vaccination. Research suggests that even if HPV is present, Gardasil may boost immunity.
One thing we won’t be doing is passing on Douglas’s nonsensical advice – that oral sex is also the “best cure” for throat cancer. It may have been a joke, but what was he thinking of?
For more advice: http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/STIs/Pages/Sexualactivitiesandrisk.aspx#Attitudes
I’m not sure just how sexually active my sons have been, or are. The elder is now in a serious relationship; the younger one is, I suspect, on the verge of sexual discovery. And I don’t know, nor wish to know, about the types of sex they may engage in.
Private HPV vaccinations for boys are available; although Gardasil is only licensed for boys aged 9-15, it can be prescribed outside this range “at the doctor’s discretion”, according to one clinic. But it isn’t just the cost – about £500 for three injections – that makes me hesitate. How do you approach a young man who has just fallen in love for the first time and suggest that he be vaccinated against an infection he might “catch” from his beloved during certain sexual practices? And since 90 per cent of those who are sexually active have been exposed to HPV by the time they are 25, it may be too late anyway.
Maybe we have been too queasy about raising this issue with our children – or maybe we are too anxious, given that the risk of getting cancer from oral sex is probably very small, compared with the risk from tobacco and alcohol. Clearly we can’t get young adults to swear off oral sex, though we might send them useful NHS advice on preventing infections via this route, or offer to fund a private vaccination. Research suggests that even if HPV is present, Gardasil may boost immunity.
One thing we won’t be doing is passing on Douglas’s nonsensical advice – that oral sex is also the “best cure” for throat cancer. It may have been a joke, but what was he thinking of?
Related Articles
-
Michael Douglas: oral sex caused my throat cancer
03 Jun 2013 -
How risky is oral sex?
03 Jun 2013 -
Michael Douglas has broken the last taboo for men
04 Jun 2013
For more advice: http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/STIs/Pages/Sexualactivitiesandrisk.aspx#Attitudes
4-year-old raped by cousin in Dindori
TNN | Jun 10, 2013, 04.39 AM IST
BHOPAL: A four-year-old girl has been admitted to district hospital in a serious condition after being allegedly raped by his cousin in Dindori district on Sunday evening. The girl who was found unconscious by her parents sustained serious injuries in her privates.
The incident took place at ward number 13 of Samnapur village of the district. Accused Sanjay Yadav, 15, who is a distant relative of the victim took the girl to an isolated place and raped her. Later when she started bleeding, he took her to a nearby river and washed her clothes to hide the crime, police said.
Samnapur police station in charge Vijay Singh Patil told TOI, "The incident took place at around 3 pm in the evening and matter was reported after two hours, when the girl was found in an unconscious condition".
When the accused brought the girl from the river after washing blood marks from her clothes and private parts she turned unconscious, he left her in same condition at her home. The parents came to know of the incident and reported the matter to police, he added.
"Accused has been arrested and the victim who is critical has been sent to district hospital," informed Patil.
Meanwhile, chief medical and health officer of the district Dr Ashok Chaudha said that the girl is out of danger but a corrective surgery would be undertaken to repair the injuries. "She has gained consciousness", he added.
Enslaved in Saudi Arabia, 200 Indians cry for help
Daniel P George, TNN | Jun 9, 2013, 12.58 AM IST
READ MORE
Indians enslaved in Saudi Arabia|Vayalar Ravi|Fahad Enterprises|Bangladeshi employer|tamil nadu
The
duped Indians were recruited for a plastic factory and ended up in a
manpower supplying company managed by two Bangladeshis.
CHENNAI: Nearly 200 skilled and unskilled labourers from Tamil Nadu, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh are stranded in Saudi Arabia after their Bangladeshi employer cheated them. The workers said they were promised jobs in a plastic factory, but were made to clean toilets.
Sources at the Indian mission in Saudi Arabia said the Indians travelled to Dammam after paying Rs 90,000 to Rs 150,000 each to a Mumbai-based labour agent called Fahad Enterprises. The workers have appealed to the government of India for help to return home.
"I have asked Indian ambassador to Saudi Arabia Hamid Ali Rao to look into this and get back to me. Despite so many awareness campaigns and advertisements asking our people to go abroad only through proper channels, many of them continue to go undocumented. This has become a big problem," minister for overseas Indian affairs Vayalar Ravi told TOI on Saturday.
The duped Indians were recruited for a plastic factory and ended up in a manpower supplying company managed by two Bangladeshis. Speaking to TOI from the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia on Saturday, the men said that they had lodged a complaint with Indian diplomats in Dammam. The workers said that the recruitment agent in Mumbai had promised them jobs as skilled workers in Al-Babtain Plastic Factory in Dammam.
A worker, who didn't want to be named fearing victimization, told TOI he and the others have not been paid since they reached Saudi Arabia two months ago. "Please help us. All we want now is to get back home and be with our families. These two months have been a nightmare for us, with no food or roof over our heads," he said. The workers said they were not given food whenever they refused to clean toilets.
The workers said they had invested their life's savings to go to Saudi Arabia and never imagined they would end up as beggars. A number of them have borrowed money from private lenders on huge interest rates; one pledged gold meant for his sister's wedding. Indian Embassy officials in Riyadh were not available for comment.
Sources at the Indian mission in Saudi Arabia said the Indians travelled to Dammam after paying Rs 90,000 to Rs 150,000 each to a Mumbai-based labour agent called Fahad Enterprises. The workers have appealed to the government of India for help to return home.
"I have asked Indian ambassador to Saudi Arabia Hamid Ali Rao to look into this and get back to me. Despite so many awareness campaigns and advertisements asking our people to go abroad only through proper channels, many of them continue to go undocumented. This has become a big problem," minister for overseas Indian affairs Vayalar Ravi told TOI on Saturday.
The duped Indians were recruited for a plastic factory and ended up in a manpower supplying company managed by two Bangladeshis. Speaking to TOI from the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia on Saturday, the men said that they had lodged a complaint with Indian diplomats in Dammam. The workers said that the recruitment agent in Mumbai had promised them jobs as skilled workers in Al-Babtain Plastic Factory in Dammam.
A worker, who didn't want to be named fearing victimization, told TOI he and the others have not been paid since they reached Saudi Arabia two months ago. "Please help us. All we want now is to get back home and be with our families. These two months have been a nightmare for us, with no food or roof over our heads," he said. The workers said they were not given food whenever they refused to clean toilets.
The workers said they had invested their life's savings to go to Saudi Arabia and never imagined they would end up as beggars. A number of them have borrowed money from private lenders on huge interest rates; one pledged gold meant for his sister's wedding. Indian Embassy officials in Riyadh were not available for comment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)