Thursday, July 30, 2015

‫قصة مؤثر جدا‬ لتوبة حسان يرويها خالد الراشد

عاجل الشيخ خالد الراشد 2015 - رسالة الى كل مهموم ومحزون - اروع ما ستسمع

إصدار مؤثر الشيخ : نبيل العوضي 2015 | حقارة الدنيا الحقيرة | إعرف حقيقته...

BLiNK NEWS EP 3 George Galloway talks Iran nuke deal and UK bombing IS i...

Palestinian baby burned to death in suspected Jewish ‘price tag’ attack

© Mohamad Torokman
A suspected “price tag” arson attack by Jewish extremists killed an 18-month-old Palestinian child in a house in the occupied West Bank and injured several other people, according to Israeli police.
The toddler died in a house fire which broke out in a village of Kafr Duma near the West Bank city of Nablus, Reuters reports.

The infamous “Price Tag” slogan, typically used by radical Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians houses, as well as other sites like Christian churches, mosques and government buildings, was daubed on the walls of the home, according to police spokeswoman Luba Samri cited by Reuters.

She called it a “suspected attack with nationalist motives,” adding that Israeli security forces were at the scene.
At least three people were taken to hospitals in the aftermath of the attack. The house was reportedly destroyed by fire at the time the family was sleeping inside. The blaze also damaged another house, which was luckily empty at the time.
The death of a child will inevitably aggravate Israeli-Palestinian tensions at the time when the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pursues the controversial settlement expansion policy in the occupied territories.
READ MORE: Israel approves building of 300 new ‘illegitimate’ West Bank homes amid demolition protests
Just this Wednesday, Netanyahu approved the construction of 300 new homes in the central West Bank Jewish settlement of Beit El despite international condemnation. US State Department responded by a statement criticizing the “illegitimate” construction.
However, Israeli authorities have, at the same time, disgruntled some of the Jewish settlers in Beit El, as the Supreme Court has ordered that two blocks of houses illegally built on the Palestinian-owned land in the same area be torn down. The demolition sparked fierce resistance, with settlers protesting and clashing with police on Tuesday.
http://www.rt.com/news/311216-palestinian-toddler-killed-jewish-attack/

‘Fame-seeking’ celebrities at war with Amnesty over legalizing prostitution


RT

© Charles Platiau
Hollywood celebrities and former sex workers are at war with Amnesty International over the group’s proposal to recognize prostitution as a human right.
The London-based human rights organization frequently receives backing from high-profile American celebrities. But Amnesty’s controversial ‘Draft Policy on Sex Work’ proposal, which argues for the decriminalization of prostitution, has not been well received.
The draft policy states that all “consensual sexual conduct between adults – which excluded acts that involve coercion, deception, threats, or violence – is entitled to protection from state interference.”

The report, which will be presented next month at an Amnesty meeting in Ireland, says banning the sex trade will lead to “increasing harassment of and violence against sex workers.”

It claims ongoing criminalization will add to more “ill-treatment [of sex workers] at the hands of the police.”

Oscar-winning actresses including Meryl Streep, Emma Thompson and Kate Right have teamed up with former sex workers and women’s rights organizations to condemn Amnesty’s idea.
In a letter co-signed by Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, urging Amnesty to reconsider its draft policy, Lena Dunham, Emily Blunt, Lisa Kudrow and Anne Hathaway said they are “deeply troubled by Amnesty’s proposal.”
The letter addressed to the human rights organization leaders reads: “[We are] deeply troubled by Amnesty’s proposal to adopt a policy that calls for the decriminalization of pimps, brothel owners and buyers of sex – the pillars of a $99 billion global sex industry.
The charity’s reputation would be “severely and irreparably tarnished” if it adopts a policy that sides with the buyers of sex, the letter concluded.

The stars are eager to see more pimps prosecuted under the “Swedish-style policy” for paying for sex.
Over a two-year period, Amnesty gathered evidence from UN agencies and interviewed sex workers around the world to find out how to best regulate the industry.

Amnesty say outlawing sex work, even indirectly, will discriminate against prostitutes and force them to work in more dangerous conditions.

Speaking to RT, Northern Irish sex worker Emily Major, who financially depends on her trade, says criminalizing the sex trade will only “put vulnerable sex workers in danger.

I myself love sex and above all enjoy being in control of my own life, my work hours and what I actually do.”

Criminalizing of the trade will only “cause the industry to go underground and make women do unsafe things to ensure they get that extra bit of business.”

The celebrities argue decriminalization of the sex trade in Germany has “failed to make sex workers safer” and made trafficking easier.

Sex worker and political campaigner Charlotte Rose told RT that celebrities “don’t have the right to judge, as they have never been there themselves.”

She said actors “prostitute themselves for their own spotlight on stage” whereas sex workers “do it behind closed doors,” claiming that people in her profession “have more dignity.”

It’s the human right to earn a living, and if the activities are consensual and do not harm a third party, no one has the right to stick there ore in.

Any celebrity that states otherwise is just looking for a glorified five minutes of fame under the topic.”

Instead, they should “spend their time helping sex workers that want to get out of the industry rather than penalizing the people who enjoy it.”

In a statement, Amnesty said sex workers are “one of the most marginalized groups in the world, so it is important that we understand, as Amnesty International, we can support their human rights.”

This is a divisive, sensitive and complex issue and it is important that we get it right. No policy has been adopted by Amnesty International and it is not possible to speculate about the eventual income of the vote.”
http://www.rt.com/uk/311078-sex-worker-celebrity-amnesty/

BLiNK NEWS EP 4 "Muslims as a suspect community," Myriam Francois Cerrah...

Sunday, July 26, 2015

فينيسيا #VEE في #ياهلا_رمضان: زوجي تركني ليلة العرس وأخذ أغراضه وسافر

10 Commandments Monument Must Come Down, Fox News Reacts Expectedly

Oklahoma Supreme Court Orders Removal of Ten Commandments

Oklahoma Supreme Court orders removal of Ten Commandments

CNN

oklahoma ten commandments monument to come down pkg_00003321

Oklahoma Supreme Court orders removal of Ten Commandments 01:32
(CNN)After the Supreme Court's week of high-profile decisions, Oklahoma's high court made a stir of its own in a ruling that had a group of self-proclaimed Satanists and an ordained Baptist minister celebrating.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the state must remove a 6-foot tall granite monument of the Ten Commandments from its capitol because it violates the state's constitutional ban against the use of public funds or property to benefit a religion.
The decision came after years of controversy and legal battles. The monument's supporters include prominent figures in the state, including Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin and members of the state's legislature.
In an interview with CNN affiliate KOCO, Bruce Prescott, an ordained Baptist minister and one of the plaintiffs in the suit against the display, said, "I'm not opposed to Ten Commandments monuments. I'm just opposed to the placement on government property, because I think that the government needs to be neutral."
Karen Monahan, a resident of Oklahoma, expressed strong opposition to the decision and told CNN affiliate KOKH-TV, "I'm not going to accept this as the final word."
Some state legislators blasted the ruling and announced they plan to try to repeal the section of the state's constitution the court cited in its decision. Oklahoma's amendment process means a statewide vote may ultimately decide the matter.
Until that happens, the Ten Commandments monument will not be the only religious statue no longer allowed on the site. A monument of Baphomet, a goat-headed satanic figure, was once destined for the state capitol, but now its owners will have to find a new place for it.
A group called the Satanic Temple has worked for years to put a Baphomet statue in the capitol as a way to "complement and contrast" with the Ten Commandments statue. After an Indiegogo campaign raised over $28,000 last year, Satanic Temple moved in earnest to build the statue and applied to have it displayed there.
The Baphomet monument is set to be unveiled later this month, and the Satanic Temple said a new home will be found for it. Even though the Satanists have to move on from Oklahoma, the Satanic Temple claimed the ruling as a win.
"The entire point of our effort was to offer a monument that would complement and contrast the Ten Commandments, reaffirming that we live in a nation that respects plurality, a nation that refuses to allow a single viewpoint to co-opt the power and authority of government institutions," Satanic Temple spokesman Doug Mesner told the Washington Post in an email.
Mesner, who also goes by Lucien Greaves, offered the Post another possible location for the Baphomet statue: "Arkansas is looking rather appealing." The government of Arkansas moved earlier this year to approve the placement of a Ten Commandments monument in its capitol.

Satanic Temple unveils Baphomet statue, protesters say 'Satan has no place' in Detroit


RT

© http://thesatanictempledetroit.com
Dozens of protesters gathered in Detroit to protest the unveiling ceremony of a controversial bronze Baphomet statue by the Satanic Temple. When the one-ton goat-headed statue was finally exposed, supporters welcomed it, and cheered "Hail Satan!"
The Satanic Temple kept the location of the unveiling of the colossal monument secret until the last moment, emailing the information to ticket holders only. The group received threats that protesters would allegedly blow it up or burn it down, according to the Raw Story.
 Embedded image permalink

On Saturday, about a hundred people reportedly gathered across the street from Bert’s Marketplace, where the Satanic Temple had originally planned to unveil the statue. It’s a vexed issue that has driven a wedge between local residents.

"The last thing we need in Detroit is having a welcome home party for evil," Reverend Dave Bullock, a pastor at Greater St. Matthew Baptist Church in Highland Park, Michigan told Reuters.
 Embedded image permalink
“This unveiling will not happen in the City of Detroit on my watch,” Bishop Corletta Vaughn of the Holy Ghost Cathedral in Detroit told the Free Press at Saturday’s protest. “I’m here to stand against this being in the City of Detroit. We will not turn over our city to Satanists. It’s a violent spirit that’s moving to the city and infiltrating that place. We will drive them out of Dodge.”

“Satan has no place in this city, or any other city,” another protestor, James Bluford of Rochester Hills, added.
Photos by the Free Press feature some protesters wearing T-shirts with the caption saying “Jesus.” Martin C. Tutwiler of Oak Park reportedly said the Satanic Temple was forcing the statute on the city because “they think we’re down as a city.”

On its website, the Satanic Temple said the statue “is intended to complement and contrast the Ten Commandments monument that already resides on Oklahoma State Capitol grounds.”
Temple spokesman, Lucien Greaves, explained in a statement earlier this year that the monument would serve "as a beacon calling for compassion and empathy among all living creatures." He added that it will also have a certain "functional purpose" – as a chair where "people of all ages may sit on the lap of Satan for inspiration and contemplation."
Although the statue of a winged Baphomet was originally meant to stand alongside the Ten Commandments monument in Oklahoma, the state Supreme Court there ruled earlier this month that the statue must be removed on the grounds that a government property cannot be used to show support for any religion.

The director of the Satanic Temple Detroit chapter, Jex Blackmore, said group members planned to transport the sculpture to Arkansas. In April, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson signed into law a bill instructing the state to erect a privately funded Ten Commandments monument on the State Capitol's grounds.
http://www.rt.com/usa/310781-satanic-temple-detroit-unveiled/

Hilary Clinton: “The Sight of a Black Man in a Hoodie is Scary” Even to “Open-Minded Whites”

The Free Thought Project

 
 

In a campaign speech on Thursday, Democratic Presidential Candidate, Hilary Clinton has let the world know that even “open-minded” white people get scared when they see a black man wearing a hoodie.
In her speech, given at South Carolina’s Brookland Baptist Church, Hilary Clinton made a painfully embarrassing pandering attempt towards the black lives matter movement.
Clinton, who was engaged in an obvious strategical propaganda move, categorically stereotyped two entire races, while ironically trying to sound non-racist.
“If we’re honest, for a lot of well-meaning, open-minded, white people, the site of a young black man in a hoodie, still evokes a twinge of fear,” said Clinton.
Oddly enough, this seems to be a campaign strategy for the former secretary of state, as she said similar remarks in San Francisco last month.
“For a lot of well-meaning, open-minded white people, the sight of a young black man in a hoodie still evokes a twinge of fear,” Clinton said.
If you fear a man based on his skin color and his choice of attire, you’re hardly “open-minded.” However, Clinton likely feels that she is an open-minded person and is attempting to justify her fear of black men in hoodies.

Stereotyping individuals, in any race, is what leads to the problems this country faces today. It creates a collective paranoia of arbitrary personal differences and leads to more divide. By Hilary Clinton saying that even well-meaning white people fear black people, she is stoking that very divide; and she most likely knows this.
That being said, the people you should be worried about are the ones in suits and ties who pass laws which are then selectively enforced against people of color. For decades, the U.S. has been using the drug war as an excuse to fill prisons with young black men, despite knowing that putting a young person in jail, highly increases their chance of future criminal activity. 
At the end of her speech, Clinton gave one last counterfeit hoorah by saying, “And that’s why I think it is essential that we all stand up and say loudly and clearly, ‘Yes, black lives matter. And we all have a responsibility to face these hard truths of race and justice honestly and directly.”
Of course black lives matter Clinton! However, if you truly understood the origin of that phrase, you’d be calling for an end to the drug war and refuse to grant immunity to abusive cops. But you are fake, so you are not doing these things.
Hilary, like all other mainstream politicians, isn’t seeking to stop the racism or reform these systemic problems, as brutality and racism are what feed the system. So, like all other politicians before her, Clinton will temporarily mold herself into whatever her advisors tell her is currently trending, all the while pushing for an ever-expanding police state.


Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/hilary-clinton-the-sight-black-man-hoodie-scary-open-minded-whites/#4x71s25fadXfSBvj.99
 

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

قصة فتاة حامل وزواجها بعد 3 اشهر قصة حقيقية

Ex-NATO commander suggests WWII-style camps for radicalized Americans


Military photo portrait of Wesley Clark. © Wikipedia
Retired US General Wesley Clark suggested that radicalized youth in America and other Western nations should be segregated the way Nazi sympathizers were held in camps during World War II.
America and its allies need to get tougher on young men, who may become radical Islamists, said Clark, who is best known for leading NATO troops during the Kosovo war. The former Democratic presidential candidate made the comments in an interview on MSNBC in response to the shooting at a recruitment camp in Chattanooga, Tennessee, that left four Marines killed.
READ MORE: Marines killed in Chattanooga attack identified as authorities search for motive
“We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized. We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning,” the retired general said. “I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists.
“In World War II, if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war,” he said. “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine, that’s their right. And it’s our right and our obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”


The suggested heavy-handed solution that implies punishing people not for criminal acts but for upholding radical beliefs came in contrast to Clark’s earlier criticisms of the excesses of the Bush administration response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, such as the torture of terror suspects. He also spoke against “the politics of fear” in dealing with the threat of foreign fighters coming home from Middle East conflicts.

The interview sparked outrage on social media, which the former general called “blogosteria” on his Twitter account. He reiterated that “US Citz who choose #ISIS are spies, enemy combatants or both. Govt should separate them from the rest of us.”
 http://www.rt.com/usa/310333-general-clark-radicalized-camps/

Kenyan maid claims she was held against her will by arrested Saudi princess




July 11th, 2013 by Associated Press in Local - Breaking News Read Time: 3 mins.
This image provided by the Irvine Police Department shows Meshael Alayban, who was arrested July 9, 2013, in Irvine, Calif., for allegedly holding a domestic servant against her will.
Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.
SANTA ANA, Calif. - Last year, a Kenyan mother left her country to take a job as a maid for a royal Saudi family hoping to make enough money to cover her ailing 7-year-old daughter's medical bills.
Once she arrived, she alleges, her passport was taken from her, she was forced to work long hours and was paid only a fraction of what she was promised.
It wasn't until she traveled with the Saudi family on their vacation to the United States that she was able to escape, according to authorities. Carrying a suitcase, she flagged down a bus in the Orange County city of Irvine this week and told a passenger she was a victim of human trafficking, authorities said.
Meshael Alayban, a 42-year-old Saudi princess, was arrested Wednesday and charged with one felony count of human trafficking for allegedly holding the woman and forcing her to work against her will.
Alayban, who is being held on $5 million bail, appeared briefly in court in Santa Ana on Thursday in a dark blue jail jumpsuit as her arraignment was moved to July 29.
"It's been 150 years since the Emancipation Proclamation, and slavery has been unlawful in the United States, and certainly in California, all this time, and it's disappointing to see it in use here," Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas told reporters after the court proceedings.
"This is certainly an example of forced labor," he said.
Defense attorney Paul Meyer declined to comment on the case. On Wednesday, Meyer argued in court for a reduced bail for Alayban, who has visited the country since she was a child, owns properties here and has given her word she will stay to address the allegations.
The case is the first labor trafficking case prosecuted in Orange County since voters approved a law last year to stiffen the penalties for human trafficking. If convicted, Alayban faces a maximum sentence of 12 years, which is double the sentence she could have received a year ago, Rackauckas said.
Prosecutors say Alayban is one of the six wives of Saudi Prince Abdulrahman bin Nasser bin Abdulaziz al Saud.
The Saudi royal family is extensive, with thousands of princes and princesses, including some who have run into trouble with the law.
In 2002, Saudi princess Buniah al-Saud, who was accused of pushing her maid down a flight of stairs, entered a no-contest plea in Florida and was fined $1,000. In 1995, another Saudi princess, Maha Al-Sudairi, allegedly beat a servant in front of sheriff's deputies providing off-duty security. No charges were ever filed.
"These people have lots of money; they think they're above the law," said Ali AlAhmed, director of the Washington-based Institute for Gulf Affairs.
In Orange County, the 30-year-old Kenyan woman told authorities she had signed a two-year contract with an employment agency guaranteeing she would be paid $1,600 a month to work eight hours a day, five days a week at the job in Saudi Arabia. But starting in March 2012, she was forced to cook, clean and do other household chores for 16 hours a day, seven days a week, and was paid only $220 a month, prosecutors said.
She was allowed to have a passport only long enough to enter the U.S., prosecutors said.
Once here, she was allegedly forced to tend to at least eight people in four units in the same Irvine complex, washing dishes, cooking, cleaning, doing laundry and ironing.
When police searched the condo, they found four other workers from the Philippines. The women left voluntarily with officers and told them they were interested in being free, police said.
No charges have been filed related to those women and police said there were no signs any of the workers had been physically abused.
The women's passports had been held with the victim's documents in a safe deposit box, Rackauckas said.
If Alayban is released on bail, she will be required to wear a GPS monitoring device and remain in Orange County unless she has prior authorization from the court. On Thursday, the judge issued a protective order barring her from communicating with the woman from Kenya, whose name was not released. She also surrendered her passport.
Rackauckas said Alayban's husband was at the Irvine condo during the police search. Authorities said there was no evidence to implicate him in the case.
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2013/jul/11/saudi-princess-arrested-us-human-trafficking-charg/113075/

Monday, July 20, 2015

Doggart- the Tennessee Terrorist


MuslimMatters.org logo
By Khalil Meeks
Federal law enforcement agents caught a real terrorist. He was plotting to attack a small town in New York, burn its buildings and kill its residents. The terrorist was planning to bring like-minded militants and various weapons to help him kill as many people as he could.
“If it gets down to the machete, we will cut them to shreds.”
No informant provided the plot or tried to convince him to commit these crimes. This would-be massacre was the sole creation of this real-life terrorist.
Federal prosecutors secured a plea deal on April 24. The defendant in this case admitted to “threatening an armed attack and firebombing of a New York… community.” A victory for the F.B.I. Yet, the agency did not issue a press release or hold a press conference touting this latest win in their war on terror. No well-orchestrated media circus followed this plea deal.
IslambergNYMuslims600x450
In fact, federal prosecutors were only seeking charges related to violating “civil rights laws,
specifically a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 247(a)(1), intentionally defacing, damaging, or destroying any religious real property, because of the religious character of that property, or attempting to do so” and threatening to kidnap or injure others.
This individual, who was planning to attack with a small army and kill innocent people, was not charged with any terrorism related crimes. None.
His name? Robert Doggart.
RobertDoggartFlags
His target? Approximately 200 Muslim residents in Islamberg, NY.
Doggart is an ordained Christian minister. He is a Navy veteran. He is an engineer with a Ph.D in engineering management from LaSalle University. He is white, Protestant and a Tennessee native. He ran for Congress in 2014 and received 9,200 votes. He referenced his faith as justification for his crimes.
I do not mention these facts to shed a negative light on Christianity, veterans, engineers, LaSalle graduates, whites, Tennesseans or congressional candidates. None of these characteristics are relevant to this individual's crimes. I mention these facts to highlight the vast differences in how Muslims and non-Muslims are treated by federal law enforcement and the media.
If Doggart was a Muslim, does anyone doubt the news media would be whipped into a panic-filled frenzy over the F.B.I.'s latest terror arrest? Does anyone doubt that the F.B.I. would pursue terrorism-related criminal charges? Does anyone doubt that the F.B.I. would be calling this their latest victory in their war on terror?
When the F.B.I. accuses a Muslim of committing a crime, terrorism charges are often thrown in his or her face. In fact, federal law enforcement spokespersons often describe Muslim defendants as terrorists even when no terrorism charges are involved in the case. This was true for Aafia Siddiqui, Ibrahim Dremali, Rafil Dhafir and others.
Adding a terrorism label to a criminal cases also increases the prison terms. It's called “terrorism enhancement sentencing guidelines” and can more than double the time a defendant spends in prison. These guidelines seem to have been written just for Muslims.
This comes as no surprise. The federal law enforcement agents received training from anti-Muslim extremists who teach them to view Muslims as violent and radical. Not just some Muslims… all Muslims.
The Doggart case just affirms what we've observed for more than a decade. Muslims are treated differently in the American justice system. The “terrorism” label is often thrown at Muslims in an apparent attempt to increase the chances for convictions – and it seems to be working. Terrorism is scary and no one wants to let a terrorist go free. But when these labels are reserved for a special classification of people (i.e., Muslims), then a separate and unequal system of justice is created.
And that's a system of injustice.
Doggart is currently out of jail on a $30,000 bond as he waits for a judge to sign the plea deal. If signed, Doggart faces up to five years in prison for planning to massacre 200 Muslims… men, women and children.
Five years… not 65, 86 or life in prison. Just five years.
Hopefully, this case highlights the need to defend Muslims against injustice in the American court system. Hopefully, this case sheds additional light on the problems Muslims face when caught up in the controversial, biased and unfair targeting and discrimination against Muslims by law enforcement and the courts. Hopefully, this case serves as an example of how important it is for Muslims and all supporters of equality and freedom to “stand out firmly for justice” because this is not the only “if he were Muslim he would have been called a terrorist” case in America.
Khalil Meeks is the Executive Director of Muslim Legal Fund of America —a national charity that funds legal work and programs to defend Muslims against injustice in American courtrooms, prisons and communities. Established in 2001, MLFA has defended freedom of speech, association, and religion as well as the right to a fair trial and other constitutional rights.
http://muslimmatters.org/2015/05/29/doggart-tennessee-terrorist/

Human Trafficking African Football Players: Fake Talent Organisations

Black Diamond Fools Gold trailer: Human Trafficking African Football pla...

Broken Landscape: Confronting India’s Water-Energy Choke Point

Cornel West: It's time to remove the Confederate flag

Georgetown Professor Tells White Woman "I Have No Respect For Your Ances...

Georgetown Professor Tells White Woman "I Have No Respect For Your Ances...

Meet Tennessee's neo-Nazi white supremacists

Sunday, July 19, 2015

يقين | احمد راسم النفيس يهاجم النظام السعودي بسبب"عاصفة الحزم"

تعليق د.عدنان ابراهيم على صورة شرب ناس للخمر خلال محاضرته في باريس.

How Humanity Has Enslaved Itself


 Collective-Evolution

How Humanity Has Enslaved Itself




enslav

Most people won’t believe they are enslaved, though some believe they are enslaved by the ruling elite. But when we look deeper into this predicament, we may be able to see that we are in fact enslaved or trapped by our own minds.
Man is a slave. He is not born as a slave, he is born free. He is born as freedom, but he is found in chains everywhere. He lives in chains, he dies in chains. This is the greatest calamity that has happened to humanity.
– Osho
1504070_10154305815230092_5459644349468801387_n

Feeling vs. Expression

We have a feeling, and then there is the expression of that feeling. The feeling is the intent, the motivation, the driving force. The expression is the action we take to express this feeling. This operates throughout life in everything we do. But conflict and suffering arise when the expression does not match the feeling – and I believe this is the predicament of most of humanity.
For example, an artist has a strong feeling about something, which is authentic; she expresses it on canvas. This expression pleases some people and they buy her work; she gains money and reputation. Her expression gets noticed and becomes fashionable. She seeks to reproduce something of similar quality, and the expression becomes habitual and stylized. Inevitably, the expression becomes more important than the feeling, and soon the feeling evaporates.
When expression becomes all-important because it is pleasurable, satisfying, or profitable, then there is cleavage between expression and feeling. When the feeling IS the expression then the conflict doesn’t arise, and there is no contradiction. But when profit and thought (desire, power, money, status, ego) intervene, then this feeling is lost through greed, and we become a slave to money, desire, and ego. The passion of feeling is entirely different from the passion of expression, and most of society is caught in the passion of expression.
Let’s take a lawyer, for example. How many lawyers do you know of who are really passionate about upholding the law, and making society morally and ethically positive? Or, perhaps do you think their driving force and intent is the money and status that comes with being a lawyer? You only need to look at what lawyers charge to answer that question. Lets take a doctor. Totally interested in healing people? Or perhaps money has some say in it? I think you’d be hard pressed to find anybody who isn’t in their career for what they can get out of it – money.
To be brutally honest, I feel that it would be very rare to find somebody whose life and career totally reflects their feeling, and doesn’t care one iota about the remuneration. Maybe it was like that in the beginning for most people; the excitement, new prospects. But as with most jobs, the feeling withers and is replaced by the need to survive from it.

Is Life a Job?

We live in a world where life is basically a job. We believe it to be “normal” to have our alarm set in the morning, to wake up and rush around, to sacrifice the whole day in order to make money, and then look toward the weekend for respite. Is this the life we imagined as a kid? Are we truly on this wondrous planet to make life mostly about earning money?
11017863_10155516596445092_4471582195291508544_n
And then we trap ourselves again – because we are thinking, “Well yes, I have to provide for other people, I sacrifice myself in this job so that others can be happy and healthy.” And we do this without ever looking or stepping foot outside the box we have created for ourselves. We get trapped by fear; fear of the unknown. But in truth, there are millions of people all over the world who live on essentially nothing, who have a fraction of the possessions we do, and are ten times happier and content.
But! If you see this in yourself, if you understand the way in which you have sacrificed the present so that you may live happily in the future; if you see the way you have sacrificed time with your children so that you can earn money; if you see the cleavage between your truest, deepest feelings about life and the actual way you live life – then this is an opportunity! If you can see yourself doing all or any of this, then why not make changes? Do you really need all that stuff, the upgraded car, the bigger house? Do you need to work so many hours? Are you bringing to life your deepest passions and feelings?
5-regrets-dying-2
You can tell when the feeling is the expression: when you are feeling creative, spontaneous, excited, passionate. When you jump out of bed, when the world just seems like a big playground. That’s a pretty good indicator. Whereas it’s also just as easy to tell when the expression has become all important, and the feeling has dissolved. It’s the exact opposite. When you struggle to get up in the morning, when you want to be somewhere else, when you look toward the weekend, when your mind is set on pay day, etc. Why not have a go at changing things up?

Free Happiness Training!

Do you want to bring more happiness into your life?
Happify's activities and games are based on a decade's worth of cutting-edge research by psychologists and neuroscientists from leading academic institutions around the world.
Happify's exercises are personalized directly for you based on your unique goals.
If you are looking to bring more peace and joy into your life this year Start out with Happify for FREE!

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/07/18/how-humanity-has-enslaved-itself/

Thursday, July 16, 2015

حلقة 11 مسافر مع القرآن 2 في تونس Ep11 Traveler with the Quran 2

حلقة 9 مسافر مع القرآن 2 الشيخ فهد الكندري في تونس Ep9 Traveler with the...

Saudi & Qatar dictatorships stabbing the Muslim World in the Back By Bridging relations with israel


Saudi & Qatar’s Wahabi Monarchies , Stabbing in the Back of Muslim World By Bridging relations with Zionist Regime of Israel
King Salman & Sh. Thani Jewish PuppetsJNN 16 June 2015 Doha : The Race is ON , and Both the Wahabi Ruled States Qatar and Saudi Arabia are wasting no time in improving their ties with the Zionist regime of Israeli, a move tantamount to an act of treason against the Muslim World and especially the Palestinian issue, which the two countries have expressed verbal support for. Yet, it seems actions speak louder than words.
For Saudi Arabia, the prospective alliance would serve a common interest and that is to sabotage a potential deal between Iran and the p5+1 over Tehran’s peaceful nuclear program. Zionist Lobby of Washington in the region are teaming up as both the Saudi monarchy and the Israeli regime have made threats against such an agreement that they fear could give rise to Iran as an economic power, under the false pretext that it would give way for building nuclear weapon.
Earlier this month, it was revealed that the incoming Israeli Foreign Ministry Director-General Dore Gold and former Saudi government adviser Anwar Eshki held a series of meetings in the US. However, this is not the first or last time that the two sides have convened on Meetings.
Riyadh’s rival, Doha, could not stand by watching Saudi-Israeli ties unravel without resorting to similar connections. Like Saudi Arabia, Qatar has shared regional interests with the Israelis such as removing President Bashar Assad from power, a doomed-to-fail goal aimed at destabilizing the axis of resistance.
Al-Manar, a Lebanese news channel, made public a visit by a top security Qatari delegation to Tel Aviv to discuss regional issues with Israeli officials, including joint support for Syrian opposition and terrorist groups.  The source also disclosed that ties between the two sides have witnessed significant improvement.
Qatar has time and time again expressed its support to the Palestinians, particularly following the Israeli wars against Gaza. At the same time, its so-called dedication to the Palestinian cause has not impeded its hosting of Israeli business offices or secretly seeking political alliance behind the Palestinians back.
When the 2014 Israeli offensive against the Gaza Strip ended, Qatar promised millions of dollars in aid to help reconstruct the destroyed enclave. The Qataris failed to keep their promises on time and instead submitted to Israeli pressure in another example of their disloyalty. Only now are the construction efforts beginning to see the light.
The Arab world declared Israeli regime as its arch enemy since the 1948 occupation and that’s why these countries are hesitant to publically sell out the Palestinians. Yet at a time when Arab support for the Palestinians is lip service, wealthy kingdoms like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are seeking to maintain their security through help from the Israeli regime, the kind of security that Gaza and the West Bank have never known.
It may seem typical for the Israelis to ally themselves with the enemies of their enemies but it stands to reason that for the Arab states in the Persian Gulf  to do the same at the expense of their “friends” means they have committed an act of political treachery.

Saudi: Friday is the first day of Eid al-Fitr


AL ARABIYA NEWS

A Malaysian Islamic authority performs the “Rukyah Hilal Syawal,” the sighting of the new moon to determine the Eid Al-Fitr celebrations, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Thursday, July 16, 2015. (AP)
Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Court has announced Friday as the first day of the Eid al-Fitr holiday after sighting a new moon, Al Arabiya News Channel reported.
For Muslims, the Eid al-Fitr celebration begins after the fasting month of Ramadan ends. During Ramadan, Muslims abstain from food, drinks and sexual intercourse from dawn to dusk, which is an exercise in self-restraint, intended to bring the faithful closer to God.
Eid al-Fitr starts when the new moon is spotted in the sky, making the Eid holiday different around the world.
Pakistani girls buy bangles for the upcoming Eid al-Fitr holiday to mark the end of the holy fasting month of Ramadan, Wednesday, July 15, 2015, in Islamabad, Pakistan. (AP)
Muslims in the UK, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE will celebrate Eid al-Fitr on Friday, while Muslims in other nations such as Iraq and Bangladesh will observe the holiday on Saturday.

People shop at Al-Ataba, a popular market in downtown Cairo, July 15, 2015. Muslims across the world are preparing to celebrate the Eid al-Fitr festival at the end of the holy month of Ramadan. (Reuters)

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/world/2015/07/16/Friday-is-the-first-day-of-Eid-al-Fitr-.html

كيفية صلاة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم.

تازة أكنول: صلاة التراويح مع الطفل ‫خالد حجو بمسجد تغزراتين

الطفل عبد الرحمن عيدون - صلاة التراويح - رمضان 1436 - الليلة الخامسة - م...

أطفال يؤموا مئات المصلين في رمضان 2015

رائد فضاء ينشر صورا مذهلة لمكة والمسجد النبوي وهما يشعان ليلا

الكون (17) قصة رائد الفضاء الذي سمع الأذان على سطح القمر

دعاء قيام ليلة القدر ۩ الشيخ محمد العريفي - قيام ليلة 27 رمضان 1436

دعاء ليلة القدر 27 رمضان 1436 2015 كامل للشيخ محمد جبريل مسجد عمرو بن ال...

فيديو.. «الدعاء على الظالمين» آخر تقاليع الأوقاف

الأربعاء 15 يوليو 2015 - PM 4:56
 
لم يكن يدرك آلاف المصلين من المصريين ممن أمّنوا على دعاء الشيخ محمد جبريل ليلة الـ27 من رمضان، بمسجد عمرو بن العاص بالقاهرة، أن يكون دعاؤهم على الظالمين وسافكي الدماء هو أحد الأسباب التي تمنعهم من أن يسمعوا صوته مجددًا.

فقررت السلطات الأمنية في مصر منع الشيخ محمد جبريل من دخول إلقاء الدروس والإمامة، بل إنها أيضًا "ستعيده لبيته"، بحسب بيان وزارة الأوقاف المصرية، والذي يبدو أن دعاءه أزعج السلطة في مصر.


وفي إثر هذه الخطبة، قررت وزارة الأوقاف المصرية منع جبريل من أي عمل دعوي بجميع مساجد جمهورية مصر العربية، سواء أكان إمامة أم إلقاء دروس، وأعلنت في بيانٍ رسمي لها "أنها ستتخذ إجراءات حاسمة تجاه أي شخص يُمكّنه من المسجد، وأن أي صاحب دين حقيقي لا يمكن أن يستغل دور العبادة لتحقيق أمجاد شخصية أو مكاسب مادية أو سياسية على حساب دين الله، وأنّ من يفهمون دين الله فهمًا صحيحًا لا يمكن أن يقبلوا مثل هذا الابتداع في بيوت الله أو الخروج بدور العبادة عن مقاصدها الشرعية"، بحسب الوزارة.

وأشار البيان إلى أن وزارة الأوقاف المصرية ستحرّر محضرًا رسميًّا بـ"هذا التجاوز" بموجب الضبطية القضائية الممنوحة لمفتشي الأوقاف، وأنها بدأت بتنفيذ القرار بإعادة جبريل إلى بيته، ومنعه من إمامة الناس، ليكون عبرة لمن "يتلاعبون بشرع الله، مع تعميم ذلك على جميع مديريات وإدارات الأوقاف".

ولكن قرار الوزارة لا يمكنه أن يخمد ثورة مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي واحتفاءها بخطبة جبريل، التي انتشرت في مقطع فيديو، شمل جزءًا كبيرًا من خطبته ودعائه على كل ظالم وكاذب وإعلامي مضلل.

"يا تعيش جبريل، يا تعيش برهامي وحسان.. أثلجت صدورنا يا رجل.. أخيرًا، لقد هرمنا من أجل هذه اللحظة، حفظك الله من كلاب السلطة يا رجل".. "يا تجهر بالحق وتكون جبريل، يا تطبل للظالم وتكون حسان.. هناك فرق بين من يخشى الله ومن يخشى الحاكم".. هذا أنموذج عن التعليقات التي أغرقت مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي منذ أمس، تعليقًا على خطبة ودعاء جبريل.

ويبدو أن الأمر لن يقف عند هذا الحد، إذ يبدو أن إشارة بيان وزارة الأوقاف المصرية لاستخدام الضبطية القضائية لن يمر مرور الكرام؛ إذ يرجح كثيرون أن يتمّ إلقاء القبض على الشيخ جبريل في الساعات المقبلة، وإحالته إلى المحاكمة، بحسب ما قاله الإعلامي المؤيد للانقلاب أحمد موسى في حلقته الأمس.

ولم يكتفِ موسى بمهاجمة جبريل فقط، بل استضاف وزير الأوقاف بحكومة الانقلاب محمد مختار جمعة، والذي صرح بنص البيان، وأقر بأنهم منعوا جبريل من الخطابة نظرًا لدعائه على الظالمين وهذا ما كان قد منعته الوزارة مسبقًا بعد الانقلاب العسكري.

كما استضاف موسى، رئيس نادي الزمالك المؤيد للانقلاب مرتضى منصور والذي ظل يهاجم ويسب طوال حلقته الشيخ محمد جبريل، وصرح بأن الوزارة رفضت بأن يكون هو "مرتضى" أمام لمسجده الذي بناه بنادي الزمالك.
وكان الآلاف من المصريين قد توافدوا إلى مسجد عمرو بن العاص بالقاهرة، أول من أمس لصلاة التراويح خلف الشيخ جبريل، وسط حضور أمني مكثف

Rouhani says nuclear deal 'political victory' for Iran

AL Jazeera

Politics

Dubbing it a proud moment for Iranians, President says Tehran will no longer be regarded as an international threat.

| Politics, Middle East, Iran, Hassan Rouhani



Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, right, who led the negotiations, is now back in Tehran [AP]
Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, right, who led the negotiations, is now back in Tehran [AP]
The nuclear deal with world powers is a political victory for Iran, President Hassan Rouhani has said, adding that the agreement meant Tehran would no longer be regarded as an international threat.
Rouhani's comment came on Wednesday, a day after Iran and six world powers reached the deal, capping more than a decade of negotiations with a landmark agreement.
 Explained: Iran deal's contents
"No one can say Iran surrendered," Rouhani said. "The deal is a legal, technical and political victory for Iran. It's an achievement that Iran won't be called a world threat any more."
Under the deal, sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and the United Nations will be lifted in return for Iran agreeing long-term curbs on a nuclear programme that the West has suspected was aimed at creating a nuclear bomb.
Rouhani said the deal was not "perfect" but it was necessary to compromise.
"It was really difficult to preserve some of our red lines," he said. "There was a time we doubted there could be a deal. It's a historic deal and Iranians will be proud of it for generations to come."

RELATED: Meet the men behind Iran's nuclear deal

Among Iran's main conditions, or "red lines", at the talks were a refusal to accept a long freeze on nuclear research and development and a demand for a rapid lifting of sanctions.
There was a time we doubted there could be a deal. It's a historic deal and Iranians will be proud of it for generations to come
Hassan Rouhani, Iran's president
Thousands of Iranians gathered in the capital, Tehran, to celebrate the deal following the end of Ramadan fast on Tuesday. They waved Iranian flags from their cars, while drivers honked their car horns.
"My personal opinion is that I wish they had done this sooner so people wouldn't have to go through all these difficulties," Masumeh Momeni, a resident of Tehran, told Al Jazeera.
Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, is now back in Tehran following the 18-day negotiations in the Austrian capital, Vienna.
Arab concern
On Tuesday, Obama said the agreement offered a chance to reset strained relations with Tehran.
"Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off," he said, adding that the deal "offers an opportunity to move in a new direction. We should seize it."
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei praised the "honest and hard endeavours" of the country's nuclear negotiating team just after the deal was clinched.
But not everyone is happy with the deal. Arab countries have deep fears of Iran gaining a nuclear weapon, and some have been skeptical that a deal will prevent that from happening.
Iran's nuclear history
But equally high for key Sunni-dominated Gulf allies of the United States is the worry that a deal gives Iran the means and an implicit green light to push influence in the region.
Saudi Arabia issued a pointed warning, saying Iran must use any economic gains from the lifting of sanctions to improve the lives of Iranians, "rather than using them to cause turmoil in the region, a matter that will meet a decisive reaction from the nations of the region," in a statement carried on the state news agency late on Tuesday.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, criticised the deal calling the decision "a historic mistake for the world".
In a second statement on Tuesday afternoon, Netanyahu said the deal gives Iran incentives "not to change" and said "the world is a much more dangerous place today than it was yesterday"

Iranians gather for celebrations following a landmark nuclear deal in Tehran [AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi]
  •  
  • 2777
  •   
  • 365
  • 1
  • All Social
  • Listen to this page using ReadSpeaker

Source: Reuters And AP

Incredible Story: Swedish man Converts to Islam Overnight!

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Can We Auto-Correct Humanity?

British woman raises awareness of abuse of women in niqab

MuslimVillage.com

by Web Desk
Source: Tribune

Filed under: Featured,Lifestyle,News,People,Society |

JC
Joni Clarke, a 22-year-old activist in the UK
By: Web Desk
Source: Tribune
A British Muslim woman is campaigning to raise awareness of the abuse she and other women face while wearing a niqab.
Twenty-two-year-old Joni Clarke, resident of southeast London, has decided to raise awareness of the abuse and discrimination that Muslim women face by making a short film. The film, My Freedom, My Right, features Clarke reciting a poem that recalls comments made to her because of her niqab.
Speaking about the film she said, “I made the video to prove a point – I wanted to highlight that people who go through struggles and discrimination every day, but are rarely talked about by the media.”
Clarke wants everyone to be treated as ‘individuals’ and urges people to stop ‘judging a book by its cover’. She turned to Islam when she was only 17 and chose to wear a niqab after studying the history of Islam.
“I was reading about the women of early Islamic communities,” she said. “Many of the Sahabah (RA) [companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)] are revered women in Islamic history, so I tried to follow what they did, including wearing the niqab.”
“Some people look up to people like Rihanna or other celebrities, but for myself, I look up to those women and chose to do things like they did.”
Since she started wearing a niqab, she has been insulted, threatened, and even attacked in public, she said and added, “When I was pregnant I got followed up the road by a bin man who shouted at me, ‘Terrorist, go home!’ and I’ve been told several times to go ‘back to my country’”.
Clarke maintains there are many Muslim women who receive worse treatment because they choose to wear the veil.
“I’ve had people flicking cigarette butts at me to try set my niqab on fire, and I’ve almost been run over a few times.”
My Freedom, My Right is not only a step towards creating awareness among the people about the sufferings of the Muslim women but also aims to alleviate their sufferings.

My Freedom, My Right

UK: Gov’t deradicalisation plan will victimize bearded Muslims


MuslimVillage.com

by ROBERT VERKEIK
Source: The Independent

Filed under: Featured,Lifestyle,News,Security and Privacy,Society |

east-london-mosque
By: ROBERT VERKEIK
SourceThe Independent
The Government’s flagship counter-radicalization strategy leads Muslims who grow beards to be labelled as terrorists and could be used to clamp down on anti-austerity and environmental campaigners, hundreds of academics have claimed in an open letter to The Independent.
Wide-ranging powers brought in this month under the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act force teachers, social workers, prison officers and NHS managers to report signs of radicalization.
Those suspected of extremism will be sent on deradicalisation programmes, while the whole system is to be policed by Government inspectors.
But the new law has been criticized as a direct assault on freedom of speech and a move towards a police state.
In an unprecedented intervention, 280 academics, lawyers and public figures claim the controversial law will make Britain less safe as it will force radical political discussion underground.
Among the leading academics who want the Government to rethink the strategy are Karen Armstrong, one of the country’s most prominent writers on religion, and Baroness Ruth Lister, emeritus professor of social policy at Loughborough University.
Another signatory is Rizwaan Sabir, 30, a lecturer in counter-terrorism, who was wrongly arrested under anti-terror laws by Nottingham Police for downloading an al-Qaeda training manual from a US Government website he we was using to research his PHD. He was later paid £20,000 in compensation after he sued the police.
The new regime, part of the Government’s counter-terrorism policy, Prevent, places public-sector workers under a statutory duty to confront radicalization. Prevent was introduced by Labour in the wake of 9/11 and remains the front-line policy for combating radicalization.
But the letter claims that “growing a beard, wearing a hijab or mixing with those who believe Islam has a comprehensive political philosophy are key markers used to identify ‘potential’ terrorism”.
It adds: “This serves to reinforce a prejudicial world view which perceives Islam to be a retrograde and oppressive religion that threatens the West. Prevent reinforces an ‘us’ and ‘them’ view of the world, divides communities, and sows mistrust of Muslims.”
Last month David Cameron said the Government would provide “a full spectrum” response to counter-terrorism, to include the vetting of external speakers at universities and banning those with extremist views. There are also plans to vet broadcast programmes for extremist content.
But the academics’ letter states: “Prevent will have a chilling effect on open debate, free speech and political dissent. It will create an environment in which political change can no longer be discussed openly, and will withdraw to unsupervised spaces. Therefore, Prevent will make us less safe.”
Last night Karen Armstrong said: “The Government’s emphasis on religious ideology as the chief driving force for extremism is both dangerous and ill-informed… It ignores the fact that influential Muslim leaders – Sunni and Shi’i, Salafi and liberal alike – have roundly condemned the policies of [Isis] as un-Islamic.
“It ignores the Gallup Poll conducted between 2001 and 2007 in 35 Muslim-majority countries in which 93 per cent of respondents asserted emphatically that there was no justification for the 9/11 attacks and the reasons they gave were entirely religious; the reasons given by the 7 per cent who claimed that the attacks were justifiable were wholly political.”
Ms Armstrong, author of Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence, added: “After interviewing over 500 people involved in the 9/11 atrocities, former CIA officer and forensic psychiatrist Marc Sageman concluded that the problem is not Islam, but rather ignorance of Islam.”
Ibrahim Mohamoud, a spokesman for the advocacy group Cage, said: “The Prevent strategy has no peer-reviewed evidentiary basis, showing a link between violence and ideology… The Prevent policy has facilitated an atmosphere in which Muslims are incriminated within a pre-crime space for nothing more than holding opinions that run contrary to those take by government. This increases the likelihood of disenfranchisement as opposed to countering it.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Protecting those who are vulnerable and at risk of radicalization is both complex and vitally important, which is why it is disappointing to see simplistic claims that are at best inaccurate and at worst scaremongering.
“The Prevent duty is about protecting those who might be vulnerable from the poisonous influence of extremism and stop them being drawn into terrorism.  It is claimed this should not be considered a safeguarding issue, yet there can be fewer harms more serious for a teenager. Teachers, social workers and others are familiar with the concepts involved in safeguarding and can readily adapt them to the harms caused by terrorism.
“It is simplistic and wrong to claim Prevent focuses ‘on religious interaction and Islamic symbolism to assess radicalization’.  There is no single cause of radicalization.  The Channel programme, a part of Prevent, assesses the vulnerability of those referred to it using a comprehensive system of 22 different factors and guidance is explicit that ‘outward expression of faith, in the absence of any other indicator of vulnerability, is not a reason to make a referral to Channel’.”