The Washington Post
Editorial Board Opinion
Notwithstanding the drought, much of this misery is man-made. Al-Shabab has driven out Western aid groups, which have not operated in southern Somalia since early 2010. It has waged perpetual war against the Somali government and U.N. peacekeeping forces. It has killed Western aid workers. According to a report in the New York Times, it has diverted water resources from poor farmers and imprisoned starving people trying to escape the country.
5
Comments
- Weigh In
- Corrections?
The alternative to intervention is to loosen restrictions that have hampered U.S. aid to groups operating in al-Shabab-controlled areas. The movement has been designated a terrorist organization; U.S. aid to Somalia dropped by some 80 percent between 2008 and 2010. According to The Post’s Mary Beth Sheridan, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has been working on ways to ensure that aid groups working in Somalia will not face prosecution if they are forced to pay bribes to al-Shabab or if militants divert some food supplies. State Department officials said Tuesday that they were seeking to reassure aid groups that they could deliver food and medicine without running afoul of the law.
That would still leave aid groups with the problem of gaining access to famine victims and ensuring the safety of their personnel, a number of whom have been murdered by the militants. But the crisis may be causing al-Shabab’s cohesion to break down; some commanders have been cutting deals with aid organizations to receive food supplies.
The only durable answer to Somalia’s famine is the establishment of a government that can control the entire country and that respects basic human rights. Sadly, there is little prospect of that. But the United States and other Western governments must do what they can to prevent mass starvation.