Islam is the real positive change that you need to change for being a better person or a perfect human being, you can change yourself if you read QURAN, IF YOU DO THAT !! you will change this UMMAH, say I am not A Sunni or Shia, BUT I am just a MUSLIM. Be a walking QURAN among human-being AND GUIDE THEM TO THE RIGHT PATH.
Joining a growing number of nations concerned about the effects GMO’s
pose, Scotland just banned the cultivation of genetically modified
crops. The country’s Rural Affairs Secretary, Richard Lochhead, announced last week that the clean, green nation will no longer be permitting GM crops to be grown within its borders.
As Sustainable Pulse reports,
the Scottish Government intends to take advantage of new EU rules
allowing countries to opt out of growing EU-authorized GM crops;
Scotland made its exclusion final last week.
The amendment to Directive 2001/18/EC came into force earlier this
year and allows Member States and Devolved Administrations to restrict or ban the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) within their territory.
The Scottish Government will now proceed to submit a request that Scotland be excluded from any European consents for the cultivation of GM crops, including the variety of genetically modified maize already approved and six other GM crops presently awaiting authorization.
Lochhead stated:
“Scotland is known around the world for our beautiful natural environment – and banning growing genetically modified crops will protect and further enhance our clean, green status.” He continued, “There is no evidence of significant demand for GM products by Scottish consumers and I am concerned that allowing GM crops
to be grown in Scotland would damage our clean and green brand, thereby
gambling with the future of our £14 billion food and drink sector.”
The Cabinet Secretary shared that Scottish food and drink is naturally valued at home and abroad to be very high-quality, therefore allowing GMOs to be grown would dilute its quality and, in effect, adversely affect the country’s economy.
“That is why I strongly support the continued
application of the precautionary principle in relation to GM crops and
intend to take full advantage of the flexibility allowed under these new EU rules to ban GM crops from being grown in Scotland,” he said.
Lochhead believes that GM policy in Scotland should be guided by what’s best for the economy and the agricultural sector, rather than the priorities of others.
The Rural Affairs Secretary also kicked off a national discussion on the Future of Scottish Agriculture at the Turriff Show on Monday: news.scotland.gov.uk/News/Agri-vision-1ba6.aspx He has stated openly that he welcomes feedback.
The newly amended directive applies to new cultivation dossiers and not GMOs that have already been or are currently being considered for approval.
As shared in the press release,
the newly amended directive applies to new cultivation dossiers and not
GMOs that have already been or are currently being considered for
approval. Transitional arrangements have also been put in place to
enable Member States and Devolved Administrations to request that their
territory is excluded from any consents in relation to applications that
were received prior to April 2, 2015.
Member States/Regions wishing to use the transitional arrangements to opt out of growing EU-approved GM
maize MON 810 or any of the GM maize varieties currently awaiting EU
approval must notify the European Commission by October 2, 2015.
By Liam O’Ceallaigh / walkingbutterfly.com via FilmsForAction
Take a look at this picture. Do you know who it is?
Most people haven’t heard of him.
But you should have. When you see his face or hear his name you
should get as sick in your stomach as when you read about Mussolini or
Hitler or see one of their pictures. You see, he killed over 10 million
people in the Congo.
His name is King Leopold II of Belgium.
He “owned” the Congo during his reign as the constitutional monarch
of Belgium. After several failed colonial attempts in Asia and Africa,
he settled on the Congo. He “bought” it and enslaved its people, turning
the entire country into his own personal slave plantation. He disguised
his business transactions as “philanthropic” and “scientific” efforts
under the banner of the International African Society. He used their
enslaved labor to extract Congolese resources and services. His reign
was enforced through work camps, body mutilations, executions, torture,
and his private army.
Most of us – I don’t yet know an approximate percentage but I fear
its extremely high – aren’t taught about him in school. We don’t hear
about him in the media. He’s not part of the widely repeated narrative
of oppression (which includes things like the Holocaust during World War
II). He’s part of a long history of colonialism, imperialism, slavery
and genocide in Africa that would clash with the social construction of
the white supremacist narrative in our schools. It doesn’t fit neatly
into a capitalist curriculum. Making overtly racist remarks is
(sometimes) frowned upon in polite society, but it’s quite fine not to
talk about genocides in Africa perpetrated by European capitalist
monarchs.
Mark Twain wrote a satire about Leopold called “King Leopold’s soliloquy; a defense of his Congo rule“,
where he mocked the King’s defense of his reign of terror, largely
through Leopold’s own words. It’s 49 pages long. Mark Twain is a popular
author for American public schools. But like most political authors, we
will often read some of their least political writings or read them
without learning why the author wrote them (Orwell’s Animal Farm for
example serves to re-inforce American anti-Socialist propaganda, but
Orwell was an anti-capitalist revolutionary of a different kind – this
is never pointed out). We can read about Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer, but
King Leopold’s Soliloquy isn’t on the reading list. This isn’t by
accident. Reading lists are created by boards of education in order to
prepare students to follow orders and endure boredom well. From the
point of view of the Education Department, Africans have no history.
When we learn about Africa, we learn about a caricaturized Egypt,
about the HIV epidemic (but never its causes), about the surface level
effects of the slave trade, and maybe about South African Apartheid
(which of course now is long, long over). We also see lots of pictures
of starving children on Christian Ministry commercials, we see safaris
on animal shows, and we see pictures of deserts in films and movies. But
we don’t learn about the Great African War or Leopold’s Reign of Terror
during the Congolese Genocide. Nor do we learn about what the United
States has done in Iraq and Afghanistan, potentially killing in upwards
of 5-7 million people from bombs, sanctions, disease and starvation.
Body counts are important. And we don’t count Afghans, Iraqis, or
Congolese.
There’s a Wikipedia page called “Genocides in History”. The Congolese
Genocide isn’t included. The Congo is mentioned though. What’s now
called the Democratic Republic of the Congo is listed in reference to
the Second Congo War (also called Africa’s World War and the Great War
of Africa), where both sides of the multinational conflict hunted down
Bambenga and ate them. Cannibalism and slavery are horrendous evils
which must be entered into history and talked about for sure, but I
couldn’t help thinking whose interests were served when the only mention
of the Congo on the page was in reference to multi-national incidents
where a tiny minority of people were eating each other (completely
devoid of the conditions which created the conflict no less). Stories
which support the white supremacist narrative about the subhumanness of
people in Africa are allowed to be entered into the records of history.
The white guy who turned the Congo into his own personal
part-plantation, part-concentration camp, part-Christian ministry and
killed 10 to 15 million Conglese people in the process doesn’t make the
cut.
You see, when you kill ten million Africans, you aren’t called
‘Hitler’. That is, your name doesn’t come to symbolize the living
incarnation of evil. Your name and your picture don’t produce fear,
hatred, and sorrow. Your victims aren’t talked about and your name isn’t
remembered.
Leopold was just one part of thousands of things that helped
construct white supremacy as both an ideological narrative and material
reality. Of course I don’t want to pretend that in the Congo he was the
source of all evil. He had generals, and foot soldiers, and managers who
did his bidding and enforced his laws. It was a system. But that
doesn’t negate the need to talk about the individuals who are symbolic
of the system. But we don’t even get that. And since it isn’t talked
about, what capitalism did to Africa, all the privileges that rich white
people gained from the Congolese genocide are hidden. The victims of
imperialism are made, like they usually are, invisible.
If you’re aware that only a handful of corporations
(6, to be exact) control over 90% of the media, you’re one of the few.
What this means, is that everything you hear on the radio, read in the
news, and see on television (including the ‘news’), is controlled by one of these six corporations: General Electric (GE), News-Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS.
This startling truth has become more commonly accepted in recent years, especially since Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based initiative to control mainstream media, was exposed.
Popular avenues of information are now bombarded with clever marketing tactics
telling the public what to think and what to buy, how to look, and
where to spend hard-earned dollars. Such is evident once you wake up and
note the blatant lies
continuing to spam the TV screen and newspaper headlines – especially
concerning the topics of health, food, war (“terrorism”), poverty, and
more.
Sadly, people aren’t even aware of how brainwashed they’ve become. That’s where Sheryl Attkisson comes in.
It was a picture which shocked the world: the woman named as a suicide bomber in Paris relaxing naked in the bath.
But
MailOnline can reveal that the picture, and another of her with two
friends, are not of the dead woman - and is in fact of an innocent
Moroccan woman who was the victim of a cruel identity theft.
Today Nabila Bakkacha says: 'I want the world to know I am not a terrorist.'
Mrs
Bakkacha, 32, a mother of three, has been abused as a 'terrorist' in
her home town, despite being herself appalled at the evil of ISIS, and
forced to make a statement to police.
'The photo of me is nothing to do with Hasna Ait Boulahcen,' she said. 'This is a picture of another person.
'It is a picture of me, Nabila, a normal person, someone who lives with her children, who has a little job.'
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
+9
+9
Innocent:
Nabila Bakkacha (left) is speaking out to let the world know that she
was the victim of a cruel smear when her identity was stolen and she was
portrayed as 'suicide bomber' Hasna Ait Boulahcen.
Mrs Bakkacha believes that she was betrayed by a woman who had been her friend, but with whom she has since fallen out.
MailOnline
obtained and published the photographs, showing the woman in the bath
and with two female friends on Thursday last week. They were reproduced
shortly afterwards in Moroccan newspapers.
At
the time Hasna Ait Boulahcen was believed to have committed suicide
with an explosive belt as police moved in on her cousin, massacre
mastermind Abdelhamid Abaaoud.
The
pictures had been provided on an estate in France, near the German
border, where Miss Boulahcen had stayed on and off with her father in
recent years.
Before publication the pictures were verified by five men as being of the dead woman.
One of them went so far as to claim to be her cousin and wept when he was shown the picture of the woman in the bath.
Mrs Bakaccha, who has three children aged from 12 to seven, became aware of the pictures early on Friday.
'My friends saw the articles. This was on Friday morning at about 4am,' she said.
'They
called me on the phone that there were photographs of me in Moroccan
newspapers, photos along with an article about Hasna the terrorist.
'I
opened the web pages of the newspapers on my phone and I saw the
articles. I was shocked. I was totally dumb-struck. Since then the
problems have started in Morocco.'
Mrs
Bakkacha has been ridiculed by neighbours and passers-by and has been
forced to make a statement about the article to the police.
She said: 'I had to spend four hours at the police station giving a statement. I’ve not had a good day.'
She
added: 'I have not slept since Friday morning. I’ve hardly eaten. I
just want to set the record straight. Since Friday my life has changed –
anger, fear, trauma, everything.
'I have lost my job – the boss called me and told me not to bother coming in.'
Mrs
Bakkacha believes that the image of her in the bath originates with a
former friend who took the photograph on her mobile phone. However that
friend denied to MailOnline that she was the source of the picture.
Mrs Bakkacha said that she was mystified by the actions of whoever ultimately released the pictures to the wider world.
'When
I realised what [the person] had done I felt bad, it was terrible,
unacceptable. Jealousy, vengeance, I don’t know what [their] motive
could be, but really [they] must be mad to have done that.
'I have never even had a copy of that picture.
'I
don’t know how [they] could have done this. '[They have] put my life in
danger because the world thinks that I am a terrorist.'
MailOnline
then withdrew publication of the photographs and immediately launched
an investigation, sending reporters to Creutzwald and Morocco.
MailOnline is now satisfied that Mrs Bakkacha is the woman in the
photographs.
Mrs
Bakkacha and her former friend - whose identity MailOnline is aware of
but is not disclosing - grew up together after Mrs Bakkacha moved to
France as a teenager.
'When I first went to France, I didn’t speak French very well and she helped me,' she said.
'Her
family are Moroccan but she is French. We could speak together in
Arabic. But later we fell out and have had lots of disputes.'
This
weekend however the woman denied that when she was approached by
MailOnline. She denied having any knowledge of how the picture emerged,
although she said she had seen it in the past, and had been a friend of
Mrs Bakkacha.
She
said that she believed the image of Mrs Bakaccha in the bath to be in
fairly wide circulation. The friend said she knew the dead woman.
Mrs Bakkacha however knows neither the dead woman, nor her terrorist mastermind cousin. 'I do not know Hasna,' she said,
'I've only been to Paris once, and that was on a school trip in 1999.'
On
Friday French prosecutors announced that Mrs Boulahcen had not been a
suicide bomber, suggesting she was in fact a victim of her murderous
cousin.
Mrs Bakaccha said that she also wanted her name to be entirely cleared of any association with the Paris massacre.
'I don’t know any of these terrorists. I’m against terrible violence,' she said.
‘The families of the victims when they see my picture what do they think? This is the person who has killed their loved-ones?
His conviction was based on a witness who claimed to have heard his cursing God, as well as his poems.
Posted: 11/20/2015 02:04 PM EST
RIYADH, Nov 20 (Reuters) - A Saudi Arabian court has sentenced a
Palestinian poet to death for apostasy, abandoning his Muslim faith,
according to trial documents seen by Human Rights Watch, its Middle East
researcher Adam Coogle said on Friday.
Ashraf Fayadh was detained by the country's religious police in 2013
in Abha, in southwest Saudi Arabia, and then rearrested and tried in
early 2014.
The verdict of that court sentenced him to four years in prison and
800 lashes but after appeal another judge passed a death sentence on
Fayadh three days ago, said Coogle.
"I have read the trial documents from the lower court verdict in
2014 and another one from 17 November. It is very clear he has been
sentenced to death for apostasy," Coogle said.
Saudi Arabia's justice system is based on Sharia Islamic law and its
judges are clerics from the kingdom's ultra conservative Wahhabi school
of Sunni Islam. In the Wahhabi interpretation of Sharia, religious
crimes including blasphemy and apostasy incur the death penalty.
In January liberal writer Raif Badawi
was flogged 50 times after his sentencing to 10 years in prison and
1,000 lashes for blasphemy last year, prompting an international outcry.
Badawi remains in prison, but diplomats say he is unlikely to be
flogged again.
Hans Punz/Associated Press
Saudi judges have extensive scope to impose sentences according to
their own interpretation of Sharia law without reference to any previous
cases. After a case has been heard by lower courts, appeals courts and
the supreme court, a convicted defendant can be pardoned by King Salman.
Fayadh's conviction was based on evidence from a prosecution witness
who claimed to have heard him cursing God, Islam's Prophet Mohammad and
Saudi Arabia, and the contents of a poetry book he had written years
earlier.
The case went to the Saudi appeals court and was then returned to
the lower court, where a different judge on November 17 increased the
sentence to death. The second judge ruled defense witnesses who had
challenged the prosecution witness' testimony ineligible.
Saudi Arabia's Justice Ministry or other officials could not immediately be reached for comment. Related on HuffPost:
The
co-chair of Germany's opposition Green Party, Cem Ozdemir, slams
Germany and its allies for “hypocrisy and duplicity” in their dealings
with Saudi Arabia. Germany
and its allies must re-examine their relationship with Saudi Arabia
where arms are sent and oil returns, said Ozdemir at the party’s annual
congress on Friday. He noted that as long as this hypocrisy remains, success is unattainable in the battle against the Daesh Takfiri terrorists.
"Saudi Wahhabism is not part of the problem," he said, stressing that, "It is the source of the problem."
Takfirism is largely influenced by Wahhabism, the radical ideology dominating Saudi Arabia and freely preached by Saudi clerics.
The
Daesh terrorists, who were initially trained by the CIA in Jordan in
2012 to destabilize the Syrian government, now control parts of Syria
and Iraq. They have been engaged in crimes against humanity in the areas
under their control.
Ozdemir made the remarks at a time that the
monarchy’s forces were engaed in a deadly war on the impoverished Yemen,
which has failed to prevent the West from selling arms to Saudis.
Just
earlier this month, the Pentagon said that the US State Department has
approved a $1.29 billion sale of smart bombs to Riyadh.
قال الكاتب البريطاني ديفد هيرست إن (الرئيس المصري) عبد الفتاح السيسي يترأس أكثر الأنظمة قمعا وإجراما في تاريخ مصر
الحديث وعليه أن يرحل، وإذا لم يفعل ذلك فستسير البلاد بطريق الكارثة التي
ربما تنتهي بتفتت الدولة ولجوء جماعي إلى أوروبا، وقبل أن يحدث ذلك يجب أن
يتسلم أي كان زمام الأمور حتى إذا كان ضابطا آخر في الجيش المصري.
وأضاف هيرست الذي يدير موقع "ميدل إيست آي" الإلكتروني بأن
هناك رجلا واحدا يقف وراء الفوضى التي تعيشها مصر حاليا وهو السيسي، وهناك
مؤسسة واحدة تقف وراء هذه الفوضى وهي مؤسسة الجيش.
وقال أيضا إن السيسي لا يهمه تشبيه أحداث رابعة
بالمذابح الأخرى مثل مذبحة تينانمين أو أنديجان، ولا تهمه تقارير منظمات
حقوق الإنسان ولا بيانات الشهود حول القتل والتعذيب بالسجون ومراكز
الاحتجاز والتعذيب والمحاكمات الارتجالية وأحكام الإعدام الجماعية "فقد
امتصها السيسي جميعها".
عدة جبهات وأوضح الكاتب أن السيسي يخسر المعارك على عدة جبهات. ففي شبه جزيرة سيناء يشهد تنظيم الدولة الإسلامية نموا مستمرا. ويورد الكاتب أرقاما عن الهجمات خلال الفترة من عام 2012 و2015 ليؤكد ما ذهب إليه.
"هيرست:
السيسي حاليا يعيش أضعف فترات حكمه الفردي المطلق، ومن المؤكد أنه سيخسر
قريبا السيطرة على الاقتصاد وزمام السلطة السياسية ومقاليد الأمن، وإن
دولته نفسها تسير نحو الفشل"
وفي المجال السياسي، يقول هيرست إن السيسي كان لا يبالي مع
مؤيديه مثلما هو لا يبالي مع مصر بأكملها، وإن مراكز الاقتراع في
الانتخابات الأخيرة تشهد على ذلك بقلة من دخلوها للإدلاء بأصواتهم، قلة
أثارت الضحك لدى الجميع.
وأضاف أن مؤيدي انقلاب يوليو/تموز العسكري الذي قاده السيسي
أصبح كل منهم يعترف بعد عناء ومشقة بأنه أخطأ في تأييده، وليس هناك مثال
أقوى من مثال أسرة سويف: ليلى سويف وابنها المدوّن علاء عبد الفتاح اللذين شجعا الجيش على قمع المعتصمين بميداني رابعة والنهضة.
وأشار الكاتب إلى أن علاء انتهى اليوم إلى السجن مع 41 ألف
سجين سياسي آخر، وانتهت ليلى إلى الإضراب عن الطعام وهي تقول "السيسي رئيس
لأكثر نظام إجرامي وقمعي في مصر خلال حياتي، وأنا الآن على مشارف الستين من
عمري".
انخفاض تاريخي وعلى
جبهة الاقتصاد، يقول هيرست إن الجنيه المصري ينخفض بسرعة لم تحدث منذ حكم
الملك فاروق، وإن تغيير محافظ البنك المركزي الذي يحاول الآن دعم الجنيه
بزيادة سعر الفائدة وضخ الدولار للبنوك، لن يوقف انخفاض العملة المصرية
التي خسرت 14% من قيمتها خلال العشرة أشهر الماضية.
الكاتب دعا إلى اعتبار أزمة العملة المصرية فريدة في سجلات
سوء الإدارة المالية، قائلا إنه وقبل عامين استولى السيسي على السلطة
وخزينة الدولة لا تشكو قلة السيولة النقدية، وكان يتمتع بدعم أكثر دولتين
ثريتين في الخليج العربي بالإضافة لدعم الولايات المتحدة والاتحاد الأوروبي وشركات النفط والغاز متعددة الجنسيات.
وكشف هيرست عن أن نظام السيسي حصل على ما يقرب من أربعين
مليار دولار خلال الفترة من يوليو/تموز 2013 ويناير/كانون
الثاني-فبراير/شباط 2014. وتساءل عن المكان الذي ذهبت إليه كل هذه الأموال؟
وقال إن مصر لن تحصل بعد اليوم على منح خليجية.
وقال كذلك إن السيسي حاليا يعيش أضعف فترات حكمه الفردي
المطلق، ومن المؤكد أنه سيخسر قريبا السيطرة على الاقتصاد وزمام السلطة
السياسية ومقاليد الأمن، وإن دولته نفسها تسير نحو الفشل
For the first time urban terrorism, guerrilla tactics and conventional fighting have been combined in a lethal blend
The Islamic State (Isis) has always massacred
civilians in large numbers to show its strength and instil fear in its
opponents. In the West, people notice these atrocities only when they
take place on their own streets, though Isis suicide bombers killed 43
people in Beirut on 12 November and 26 more in Baghdad on 13 November.
These attacks are almost impossible to stop because they are directed
against civilians, who cannot all be defended, and the bombers are
willing to die in order to destroy their targets.
Isis has claimed the Paris attacks, saying that France was
targeted because of its air strikes in Syria. The use of eight suicide
bombers and gunmen in a national capital, guaranteeing maximum coverage
by the media, has all the hallmarks of an Isis operation. One ominous
difference from the killings earlier in the year at Charlie Hebdo
magazine and in a Jewish supermarket, is that attacks, presumably
because of Isis involvement, are getting more sophisticated and better
planned. Recruiting, arming, coordinating and keeping hidden the Paris
killers until the last moment implies good organisation. The same was
true of the smuggling of a bomb on to the Russian plane before it left
the ground at Sharm al-Sheikh on 30 October.
What is the explanation for this recent intensification of
Isis suicide bombings outside Syria and Iraq? The killing of civilians
as complicit in the acts of their governments was always part the
ideology of al-Qaeda, an approach most famously demonstrated on 9/11 in
New York. The softest of targets is destroyed by bombers or gunmen
intent on killing themselves along with their enemies as a demonstration
of religious faith.
But there is a further reason why Isis may be intent on showing that
it can strike anywhere in the world: for the first time in two years, a
period during which Isis has created its own state in western Iraq and
eastern Syria, it is being driven back by military pressure on a number
of fronts.
In the past, it would deal with its numerous but disunited enemies
one after the other, but now it is facing attacks on a number of fronts
at the same time. The Syrian army backed by Russian air strikes last
week ended the siege by IS of Kweiris Airbase west of Aleppo. It was the
biggest Syrian government victory for two years. The Syrian Kurds, in
cooperation with the US air force, are advancing south around Hasaka,
while the Iraqi Kurds, again with American air support, have captured
Sinjar city west of Mosul. Isis will find it difficult to travel between
Raqqa and Mosul and may lose its grip on the oilfields of north-east
Syria, from which it has derived revenue.
Kurdish Peshmerga forces flash the victory sign as they enter the northern Iraqi town of Sinjar
These developments on the battlefields of Iraq and Syria may seem
distant from the butchery in the heart of Paris. But it is important to
understand that Isis is an effective fighting machine because its
military skills, evolved during years of fighting, are a potent blend of
urban terrorism, guerrilla tactics and conventional warfare. Its
blitzkrieg advances in Iraq in the summer of 2014 were preceded by a
wave of suicide bombings using vehicles packed with explosives in Shia
districts of Baghdad and central Iraq. The aim was to keep its enemies
frightened and off balance and to show to potential supporters that
Isis was a power in the land.
Nobody in the outside world paid much attention to the thousands of
Iraqi Shia who were killed then and have gone on dying because of
Isis terrorist bombings in Iraq. The number of civilians killed in Iraq
jumped from 4,623 in 2012 to 9,473 in 2013 and to 17,045 in 2014,
according to Iraqi Body Count, an independent website; a high proportion
of these killed were Shia victims of Isis bombers and executioners.
This savagery is now being repeated in the streets of Paris and Ankara,
where 102 demonstrators for peace were killed by two suicide bombers on
10 October.
Mourners in Ankara hold images of victims and banners as they gather at the site of twin explosions that killed 102 people
It is part of Isis’s tactical manual to retaliate against any
opponent by any means, with the aim of showing defiance in some
spectacular way guaranteed to dominate the international news agenda.
Thus, it reacted against US air strikes, which it could not prevent
militarily, with videos of American journalists and aid workers being
decapitated with horrific deliberation. When cutting off heads ceased to
have its previous shock effect, IS burned to death a Jordanian pilot in
a cage.
It claims that the killing of civilians is not mindless murder but
vengeance: an Isis-related group saying it was behind the destruction of
the Russian plane and its 224 passengers showed pictures on the
internet of the aircraft’s wreckage interleaved with shots of buildings
in Syria shattered by Russian bombs. Isis is making clear that, if any
country bombs them from the air, it will reply in kind on the ground,
using the methods of urban terrorism backed by a well organised state.
It is difficult to think of any example of this happening before.
These acts of terror require some resources, but no high degree of
training since targets chosen are defenceless such as the British
tourists lying on a beach in Tunisia or the people in Paris who were
murdered as they attended a rock concert. Not a great number of Islamic
fanatics are needed to carry out these monstrosities, the impact of
which echoes around the world. Isis has had a great number of foreign
fighters pass through its ranks and it can usually find committed
supporters within the countries it intends to target.
There is a further reason why Isis may find it more easy to find and
use potential suicide bombers outside the caliphate. One of the setbacks
it has suffered this year is the loss of its main border crossing
between Syria and Turkey at Tal Abyad, which was captured by the Syrian
Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) in June. Half the 550-mile
frontier between the Tigris and Euphrates is now held by the YPG, so
Isis access to the outside world is much more limited than before. The
US has put intense pressure on Turkey not to allow Isis and other
Salafi-jihadi groups to cross the border into Syria west of the
Euphrates. Volunteers who might previously have travelled through Turkey
to join IS in Syria will now stay at home and provide a pool of
committed manpower for use in suicide operations.
Isis is under unprecedented military pressure in Iraq and Syria, but
this does not mean it is going to implode. It can fight defensively as
well as offensively. It looks as if it will not fight to the finish in
battles in which enemy ground troops are supported by the US or Russian
air forces. Isis commanders are reported to believe that they made a
mistake in fighting for so long at Kobani, where they may have lost more
than 2,000 fighters to US air strikes. Instead, they will rely more on
guerrilla tactics in Syria and Iraq and expand the zone of conflict by
carrying out terrorist attacks abroad like those we have just seen in
Paris.
Rabbi
Marc Schneier is President of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding
and co-author of Sons of Abraham: A Candid Conversation About the Issues
that Divide and Unite Jews and Muslims.
People
shout slogans to call for the freedom of Jordanian pilot Mu’ath
al-Kaseasbeh, held by the Islamic State group in the Syrian city of
Raqqa. (AP Photo/Raad Adayleh)
Why don’t Muslim leaders speak out?
That question comes up every time terrorists purporting to be deeply religious Muslims carry out armed attacks that kill innocent people. Where,
commentators ask, are the moderate Muslim leaders and why aren’t they
decrying the horrors perpetuated by fellow Muslims?
In fact,
mainstream Muslims are speaking out, clearly and consistently. Leaders
around the world, many of whom I know personally through my work at the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding, have issued strong and unambiguous statements virtually every time a violent attack has occurred, condemning such acts as immoral and counter to the fundamental precepts of Islam.
Yet somehow their responses are not being heard, barely registering in the public consciousness.
Recently,
there were two major news stories of Islamist extremist attacks on
innocent civilians — the holding of 17 hostages in downtown Sydney,
Australia by a pro-Islamic State fanatic and the slaughter of 145
people, nearly all of them schoolchildren, in the city of Peshawar by
the Pakistani Taliban.
The outcry against these evil acts by
responsible Muslim leaders was nearly instantaneous. While the hostage
drama was still unfolding at the Lindt Chocolate Café in Sydney, Grand
Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohamed, the country’s highest Islamic office holder,
said he felt devastated by the attack, commenting:
‘The
Grand Mufti and the Australian National Imams Council condemn this
criminal act unequivocally and reiterate that such actions are denounced
in part and in whole in Islam.
Numerous Muslim scholars and community leaders have repeatedly denounced the Islamic State as barbaric and un-Islamic
Meanwhile,
the horrific mass murder of schoolchildren by the Pakistani Taliban was
met with near universal revulsion across the Islamic world. Dr. Zaruful
Islam Khan, President of the All India Muslim Majlise Mushawarat, termed the attack
“a blot in the face of Islam,” adding, “We don’t have words to condemn
such barbaric act and savagery … There is no justification of killing of
innocent children. It has nothing to do with humanity, leave aside
Islam.” The Islamic Society of North America repeatedly speaks out against extremism of all kinds and were among the first Muslim organizations to denounce Boko Haram.
This is nothing new. During The summer of
2014, the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza triggered an explosion of
violent anti-Semitism across Europe; many acts were committed by
Muslims. While the media highlighted the very real and deeply troubling
upsurge of violence in countries like France, Germany and Belgium, they
rarely reported on Muslim leaders who denounced the violence.
For
example, after riots by a predominantly Muslim crowd in the Paris
suburb of Sarcelles attacked a synagogue and Jewish businesses, the
local Muslim Association sent a letter of solidarity and support to the
vice president of the synagogue. National Muslim leaders took part in an
interfaith ceremony that denounced the violence and called for
reconciliation. French Council of the Muslim Faith head Dalil Boubakeur,
who attended the ceremony, affirmed that the vast majority of French
Muslims are not anti-Semitic. How could they be, he asked, when they
themselves are battling racism?
Those responses should have been
part of the story. But too often, Islam is portrayed negatively, and as a
monolithic entity. People don’t realize that there is a diversity of
opinion within Islam and that most Muslims condemn extremism and
violence.
Yes, Islamist extremism is a genuine threat to world
peace. But those who lump all Muslims together, and dismiss as
meaningless the courageous stand of the moderate majority against
extremism, aren’t helping to win that battle. Rather, they’re
strengthening extremism by perpetuating a false narrative of perpetual
conflict between Islam and the West. That is something which we must
fight with all our might.
In the fact of acts of horror, Muslims cannot remain quiet bystanders
Email
Muslims must get angry about Islamic extremismPhoto: AFP
By Felix Marquardt
1:28PM GMT 14 Nov 2015
Twelve years ago, I converted to Islam to
marry a Tunisian. It was a purely formal conversion. I remained
fundamentally agnostic until 20 months ago, I experienced a spiritual
revelation, started to believe in God and to practise my religion of
adoption.
We must take the lead in fighting and hunting down extremists, not
just beside, but ahead of, our Christian, and Jewish brothers and
sisters.
In the wake of the
Charlie Hebdo attacks earlier this year, I felt it was my duty as a
concerned Muslim citizen to express my outrage at having my religion
hijacked by mindless thugs.
With
several French Muslim theologians and intellectuals, we launched the
“Khlass le silence!” (“Enough with the silence!”) movement, which called
on French Muslims to take the lead in the struggle against the monsters
who make a sordid mockery of our religion.
Despite the emotion felt throughout France and the French Muslim community, our appeal fell largely on deaf ears.
Less than a month later I teamed up with Anwar Ibrahim, the charismatic
leader of Malaysia’s opposition; the Palestinian-Austrian theologian
Adnan Ibrahim; and a number of other authoritative Muslim figures from
all around the world.
• In pictures: A night of carnage in France's capital
Together, we argued that while our natural instinct as Muslims to
distance ourselves from the jihadists, saying that the latter have
“nothing to do with Islam”, was understandable, it was dubious
intellectually and altogether irresponsible to keep our reaction at
that.
The last serious attempt at launching a movement of
Islamic reform, led by the Egyptian Muhammad Abduh at the turn of the
20th century, ended up in failure and gave way to the creation of the
Muslim brotherhood.
To overcome the state of denial described
above and the moral decadence that is affecting many of us, nothing less
than a new movement of Islamic reform is needed.
Despite some
welcome marks of support, our calls continued to go unheeded. Our
initiative was attacked or ridiculed by many in the French Muslim
community and we were soon branded apostates by Islamic State (my
picture appeared along with death threats in their French language
propaganda magazine Dar al Islam).
Not a single Muslim leader
came to our defence in France when that happened, and barely a thousand
of our fellow Muslims manifested their support for our initiative.
On this ignominious day, the time has come for me to repeat with a
greater sense of urgency still what my cosignatories and I said earlier
this year:
“My dear Muslim brothers and sisters, it is time to
make our voices heard: we must rise up massively and tell the barbarians
who ordered, executed or condoned the acts of mass murder just
committed in Paris that from now on we will take the lead in fighting
and hunting them down, not just beside, but ahead of, our Christian,
Jewish, or agnostic brothers and sisters.
"We must do so because
Muslims are the extremists’ first victims and because we have mustered
the courage to take our responsibilities and launch a massive, global
movement for Islamic reform.
"If we do not, we must accept that
these monsters represent Islam (and us) in the face of the entire world.
With obvious consequences in many an forthcoming European election. The
choice is ours.” Felix Marquardt, founder of the Al Kawakibi Foundation and of the think tank youthonomics #enoughwiththesilence